|
|
|
|
S & A Publishing |
|
|
|
The Times September 28 2006 (Career supplement
page 9) |
|
Are your assets
safe?
Dealing with
potential fraud in the workplace requires a
delicate managerial touch: too little scrutiny and
theft goes undetected; too much suspicion of staff
and employees can feel that everything they do is
being watched.
“When fraud is
discovered within an organisation it can have a
devastating effect on staff morale because people
feel let down by those they trusted. Managers are
under pressure to show they can deal with this as
well as being aware that crime could be going on,”
says Sally Longworth, a partner at Grant
Thornton's Forensic and Investigation Services
practice.
One of the biggest
threats to company security is the theft of
corporate data and other intellectual property.
A survey published
today by database protection company Secerno
suggests managers are giving employees greater
access to sensitive information than they need to.
It claims 41% of staff can read and copy company
records not relating to their job and 56% have no
restrictions at all placed on the information they
can view at work.
The risk here is
that employees can copy files to sell to a
competitor or even criminal gangs. Personal
information stolen in this way is being used to
perpetrate identify theft which the Home Office
says is costing the UK economy £1.7bn a year.
Research by PC
security firm Prefix IT reveals that 60% of
workers have wrongly removed items from the
workplace and 11% have taken or copied
confidential documents.
“Naïve managers who
trust their staff blindly are asking for trouble,”
says Prefix IT CEO Graeme Pitts-Drake. “Small
companies can even lose their businesses
altogether if the bosses do not keep on top of
this problem. Securing company data is not about
taking a big brother attitude. It is the same as
locking your office door at night.”
Managers overseeing
a round of redundancies should be extra vigilant
when it comes to preventing all kinds of staff
fraud. The psychological contract a person has
with their employer is shattered when they lose
their job. It means many people can justify in
their own minds stealing from a company because
they feel they have been betrayed.
One controversial
area where managers can disagree is how hard to
crack down on staff using the internet at work for
personal use. Many bosses argue that employees are
stealing company time if they book holidays, shop,
contribute to blogs or send emails to friends from
the office when they should be working.
This may be true,
but being too heavy-handed can cause tension, harm
staff morale and damage the relationship with the
management unless it is handled sensitively.
Karen Black, a
partner and employment law expert at Boodle
Hatfield, says the revolution in workplace
technology has meant a steep learning curve for
most employers. “Companies need a computer-use
policy that lays down the ground rules and sets
out how the management will monitor how people use
the internet,” she says. “Covert checking is more
controversial and although it may be a more
successful way of tackling fraudulent activity
this must be balanced against the risks of
employers overstepping the mark. They could face
employment challenges from aggrieved staff.” |
|
|
|
The Times – Public
Agenda supplement February 7 2006 page 8 |
|
Sector sees a rush of younger blood
Policemen and teachers often appear younger as
people get older, but now even those hot-shot
interim managers breezing into the public sector
seem less grey-haired than they did a few years
ago.
But his is not an illusion. These senior
executives really do have fewer wrinkles because
government departments and agencies are turning to
younger blood to manage their projects and
functions on a short-term basis.
According to the agencies that provide interim
managers, the average age of these specialists
recruited to run human resources, IT or change
management teams has fallen from around 55 to
nearer 45 in less than five years.
There are a number of reasons for the shift. Many
talented managers who lost their jobs during the
dotcom crash in 2001 soon realised they could
survive and flourish without a corporate blanket
to protect them. Other talented younger executives
in their mid-thirties and early forties are now
choosing the interim route to obtain a better
work/life balance.
Perhaps more importantly, there is now an
acceptance within Government that many of the
skills and working methods honed in the business
world could and should be adopted by the public
sector. This has meant recruiting specialists -
however young – into senior posts on a contract
basis to ensure initiatives are implemented
effectively.
“Five years ago it was very rare to find a senior
interim manager below the age of 45 but today
anyone with the right skills and a good reputation
can find regular work because employers are under
pressure to deliver best practice using techniques
proven in the private sector,” says Patrique
Habboo, managing director of Praxis Executives on
Assignment.
Dr Bernard Horsford started working as an interim
manager in the public sector four years ago when
he was just 38. In January he began his latest
eight-month change management contract working for
the Crown Prosecution Service. He has also held
senior posts within the Department of Work and
Pensions and the Department for Constitutional
Affairs.
“There can be some resentment when you are brought
in to manage a team which includes people in their
fifties and sixties who may have worked for the
same department for years. You have to win them
over, but their worries tend to disappear when
they see how you perform,” says Horsford.
Another young interim is Simon Davis, also aged
just 42, who is currently project managing the
merger of departments within the Department of
Trade and Industry and the Foreign Office. He
says age is less of an issue these days as public
sector employers are desperate to find people with
a proven track record. “Any senior interim must be
able to think differently and younger managers can
be better at doing that,” he says. “They can also
be fitter and like to be very hands-on to ensure
the changes they recommend are actually put into
action.”
The decision to employ younger interims is not
based purely on the skills they can bring to the
job or their ability to slip seamlessly into a
vacant management or director role. They are often
chosen because budgetary constraints mean there is
an assumption older and more experienced interims
will demand a higher day rate.
Yet this is not always the case. A study of 1,093
executives by provider Russam GMS revealed the
average daily fee for an interim in his or her
forties was £573 at the end of 2005. This is up
from £536 last June and higher than the average
£528 paid to managers in their fifties and the
£471 charged by those aged over sixty.
Chairman Charles Russam says the day rates reflect
the huge demand for younger talented interim
managers and the fact executives in this age group
are more easily persuaded back into permanent
employment, which can affect supply to key areas
such as IT or human resources.
The laws on age discrimination in the workplace
are being tightened this year, yet in the world of
interim management a person’s skills and talent
rather than their years of experience are already
major considerations for public sector employers.
The result will be more fresh-faced managers in
trendy suits pounding the office floor. |
|
|
|
Protect and survive - CNBC European Business,
June 2006 pages 16-17 |
|
Warnings that the
gradual slide towards national protectionism in
the West will harm economic growth are getting
ever louder.
Before he retired in
January, US Federal Reserve head Alan Greenspan
described emerging trade protectionism as one of
the biggest threats to his country’s future
prosperity. Across the Atlantic, European
competition commissioner Neelie Kroes insists
protectionism is the wrong response to the
challenge of economic reform and that Europe risks
being cut off from the global market.
At a time when the
Chinese and Indian economies are growing at such a
pace, these are claims Western governments and
trade unions are being urged to take seriously.
Ironically - and
frustratingly for those like Greenspan and Kroes
bemoaning the dangers of protectionism - most of
the nations currently calling foul over the
possible takeover of their assets by foreign
companies have themselves been busy acquiring
controlling interests in overseas businesses for
years.
The international
business media has been a key vehicle to highlight
the implications of the rise in national
protectionism and attempts to restrict domestic
competition. Kroes is one a number of high-profile
figures to appear on business news television
channel CNBC Europe, for instance, to get her
views across.
She told Louisa
Bojesen, the Danish-American anchorwoman for
CNBC’s Power Lunch Europe and market reporter on
the early morning Squawk Box programme, that it is
through competition rather than protectionism that
businesses innovate. She says this is the way to
get the best from employees, make the most of a
business’s resources and push down prices for
consumers.
The European
Commission is now getting tough to defend the EU’s
internal market which is supposed to make
cross-border acquisitions easier.
The utilities sector
is one problem area identified by Brussels which
is convinced that more consolidation would be good
news for consumers. The Commission has launched 28
legal cases against 17 member states for failing
to introduce full competition in their energy
industries. Spain, for example, has been attacked
by Brussels for trying to merge Gas Natural and
Endesa to create a Spanish utility giant and stop
a bid for Endesa from Germany’s E.On.
France has come
under more general attack for its policy of
economic patriotism which effectively blocks
foreign takeovers in a range of sectors from
energy, vaccine production and casinos. Yet at the
same time the French government supports its own
industrial giants such as France Telecom when they
engage in foreign takeovers.
Elsewhere, Poland
had been criticised for asking its banking
regulators to block a deal with Italian bank
UniCredito. The Polish government is keen not to
upset Brussels just two years after joining the EU
and it reluctantly agreed to allow two national
banks Bank BPH and Pekao to merge under
UniCredito’s ownership.
The EU could suffer
from the latest protectionism row brewing in the
US. It involves the so-called Open Skies agreement
which would allow US airlines to fly to any
European airport and vice versa. It is due to be
ratified by the EU in June, but the same security
fears within the US that killed the £3.9bn
takeover of UK company P&O by Gulf-state backed
Dubai Ports World which would taken ownership of
strategically-important US sea ports have surfaced
again.
The Open Skies pact
has the backing of President George Bush and could
add an estimated $22bn to the trans-Atlantic air
travel market. Yet many Americans believe any
decision to reduce restrictions on foreign
airlines will mean domestic jobs being cut and the
US losing some control over air safety, which
opponents of the deal believe should not be
compromised after September 11.
CNBC Europe’s
Bojesen has covered the trend towards
protectionism in depth over the last few months.
She is no stranger to the workings of the global
business world having reported extensively on the
European financial markets and worked as a day
trader in the US for Peter’s Securities in Chicago
and as a financial advisor at Merrill Lynch. She
agrees protectionism is a major issue the business
community must tackle because of the large amount
of merger and acquisition money in the markets and
the demand from shareholders to see their
companies expand internationally. However, she
adds it is vital both sides of the argument are
debated in the media.
“The EU wants all
members to obey by one set of rules to allow
cross-border takeovers, but is it really wrong for
a nation such as France to want to protect its
national champions when it comes to business? We
have discussed whether countries should have the
right to stop foreign takeovers if they want to,”
she says.
Another high-profile
executive interviewed on the topic by Bojesen is
Todd Thomson, chairman and CEO of global financial
services company Citigroup’s global wealth
management division. He is responsible for The
Citigroup Private Bank and Smith Barney wealth
management brands which represent client assets of
$1.3 trillion and have 600 offices worldwide.
“The interview soon
turned to the political and economic implications
of US versus European protectionism. In the US,
domestic companies do not have the separate
cultures and governments to deal with which exist
in Europe and, as we are seeing, can create
barriers to cross-border deals,” says Bojesen.
Citigroup is the
biggest foreign bank operating in China, so
Bojesen also quizzed Thomson on how Asia fits into
the protectionism debate. “If Western countries
want to get more than a toe into territories such
as China then surely they must allow more inward
investment by the Chinese?” she says.
She cites figures
from the head of China’s National Development and
Reform Commission, Ma Kai, who claims US
investment in the country overall has risen
dramatically over the last 25 years. In 1980 only
23 US firms had operations in China with a
combined investment of around $120m. By 2005 there
were 49,000 with investments worth $51bn.
Bojesen also reports
for CNBC Europe’s sister channels in the US and
Asia and her thoughts on the global economy are
widely respected by leading businessmen and women
around the world. She has become a regular speaker
and moderator at various events, including hosting
the 3GSM World Congress Awards for mobile
technology in Cannes, France. She has also been
invited by the Danish Chambers of Commerce on two
occasions to address the London Stock Exchange.
In June she will
outline the potential implications of
protectionism and the impact it could have for
shareholders in a speech to fund managers and
analysts at the IR Magazine Awards in Stockholm.
“Many companies do not take investor relations
seriously enough. Yet when there is talk about
overseas takeovers and shareholders are getting
nervous about foreign companies acquiring equity
it is vital they feel they have a personal
relationship with the directors.”
Just how cosy that
relationship actually is will always depend on
whether shareholders agree with the policies being
followed by their company’s board. In particular,
are their own interests best served by directors
acquiring overseas strategic assets or
concentrating on protecting their own?
THE SHOW
Power Lunch Europe
is broadcast between 11am and noon and comprises
two segments
reviewing the latest
investment, careers and technology news across the
continent. The first part is Halftime Report which
examines the major trades on the London, Paris,
Frankfurt and other European markets, while the
second half comprises interviews with leading CEOs
and analysts. Regular features include Media Beat,
Investors’ Clinic, Sector Dissector and CEO Call.
Power Lunch Europe is presented by Louisa Bojesen
and Patricia Szarvas. |
|
|
|
CNBC European Business February 2006 |
|
European investors shuddered in January when the
antics of a new media company in Japan caused
panic on the continent’s stock markets.
Accusations that Takafumi Horie, the chief
executive of internet business Livedoor, had given
misleading information to shareholders caused a
wave of share selling and forced the
Tokyo
exchange to close 20 minutes earlier than normal
on January 16 after its biggest fall in nine
months.
The ripple effect around the world was immediate
as the London Stock Exchange fell 64 points at one
stage, and it took 10 days for the Nikkei itself
to return to levels before the scandal. Horie was
subsequently removed as Livedoor’s president and
arrested on suspicion of breaking security laws.
The Livedoor debacle came the day after Shell’s
oil platform in Nigeria’s sensitive Niger Delta
region was attacked by armed militants who have
since pledged to destroy the country’s ability to
export crude oil. The initial assault immediately
pushed up oil prices and de-stabilised crude oil
production in the region
Both these stories caused pulses to race among
European business people who needed to know what
effect such developments could have on their own
companies and markets.
At times like this executives often turn to the
various business television news channels
expecting concise and authoritative analysis of
the events. The broadcasters know their role is to
either put their viewers’ minds at rest or help
them decide if they need to take any action to
limit any potential damage to their shareholders’
interests. These channels also provide business
men and women with a useful platform to
communicate to the financial markets why they have
or have not taken a specific corporate decision
following an internal or external trading
incident.
An eight-minute in-depth lead story on the impact
of Nigeria’s problems was aired on CNBC Europe’s
European Closing Bell, for example. Sandra Ebner,
senior economist at DekaBank and Simon Sole,
managing director of political risk analysis
company Exclusive Analysis discussed the potential
implications for the oil markets.
European Closing Bell, which is available in 100m
homes and analyses the day’s activity on 18 of
Europe’s most influential financial stock markets,
also covered the Japanese crisis in considerable
depth. Anchorman Simon Hobbs questioned guests
including KBC Financial Products’ Japan strategist
Jonathan Allum and Gerhard Fasol, CEO at
Eurotechnology Japan KK about where the markets
might go next. Fasol has spent almost 20 years
supporting and implementing high tech business
projects in the region and linking European and US
firms with Japanese companies in the
opt-electronics, telecoms, internet and
intellectual property rights management sectors.
Hobbs has been presenting this particular show for
three years having spent five years on CNBC
Europe’s morning programmes including the early
financial news show Today’s Business Europe. He
has earned a reputation as tough interviewer with
a probing and rigorous interview style, honed on
London’s commercial news radio station LBC and
then the BBC. It is a style viewers and guests
seem to respond to.
“If he feels someone is obfuscating, ducking or
diving, or just not being precise he will be very
direct with his questioning. He will cut through a
complex issue to get to the nub of an argument
very quickly while recapping the action in the
financial markets in a more thoughtful way than
might be possible earlier in the day,” says
Weavering Capital economist James Stewart
Hobbs himself is convinced a no-nonsense approach
to interviewing is essential to attract the big
hitters on to the programme. “I will cross-examine
a person on any assumption he or she makes about a
financial issue of the day. Whether this relates
to equities or the foreign exchange markets these
are things that ultimately affect everyone’s
lives,” he says.
While some business news broadcasters prefer to
produce nation-specific programming, CNBC decided
eight years ago to go down the pan-European route.
It means treating Europe as a single market and
assuming issues and market trends cross borders
while exploiting the fact that English is the
international language of business.
Paul Donovan, global economist at UBS Warburg,
often appears on European Closing Bell to dissect
economic data such as unemployment figures or to
read between the lines of a European finance
minister’s keynote speech. “The financial markets
are much more integrated these days and what is
happening in one country will have an effect in
another even if it is not immediately apparent,”
he says.
CNBC is also the only pan-European broadcaster
covering European affairs from within the EU which
removes any national bias. It means subjects are
not covered through the eyes of the French or the
British, which provides some useful clarity for
business decision makers.
Hobbs points to European Closing Bell’s regular
coverage of the Lisbon Strategy which touches all
areas of EU economic, social and environmental
policy. The plan, agreed by EU heads of state six
years ago, is of vital interest to business
leaders as member states attempt to make the EU
the most competitive and knowledge-based economy
in the world by 2010 in response to fierce
competition from the US and Asia.
On January 25 EU commission president Jose Manuel
Barroso presented the annual progress report on
the Lisbon Strategy which identified four priority
action areas. These are more investment in
education, research and innovation; freeing up
SMEs from bureaucracy; introducing employment
policies to get people back to work; and
guaranteeing a sustainable energy supply.
Hobbs usually arrives at CNBC Europe around 10am
to scan the newspapers, check the news wires and
to read his emails, which often include story
ideas from his various contacts around the world.
At 11.30am he meets the rest of the news team to
discuss where to send the shows reporting
resources, although he knows that by the time the
show airs at 4pm the news agenda could look very
different.
European Closing Bell broadcasts when the local
markets are winding down but Wall St is in full
flow. As the programme is operating in real time
with a video wall behind Hobbs displaying market
data, the show must be flexible as well as
accurate to retain its credibility.
Initially Hobbs will discuss the last half hour of
trades in Europe and talk to reporters based at
its various network locations. To make any
pan-European programme work, the studio anchorman
needs a strong rapport with his commentators in
the field.
One of European Closing Bell’s more colourful
characters is Silvia Wadhwa who reports on the
Xetra Dax from Frankfurt. She is one of the best
known financial journalists in Germany and has a
vast knowledge of the banking industry. She joined
CNBC Europe in 1998 following the merger with
European Business News in Frankfurt where she was
a reporter. Away from the business world she has
written a trilogy about 17th century
India and counts Hollywood star Russell Crowe
among her friends.
One of the reasons for the obvious chemistry
between Wadhwa and Hobbs is they co-host the
Europe Tonight programme at 8pm Monday to
Thursday. In this slot they interview political
and financial leaders to obtain useful insight
into how the markets might react during the next
trading session.
The financial markets like to be prepared and hate
surprises, so when the unforeseen happens the
calming influence of the various business news
channels can be just what they need. |
|
|
|
FINANCIAL TIMES November 29 2005 |
|
Soho? It’s so
yesterday, darling
Many creative people
would have to be dragged kicking and screaming out
of London’s West End, especially if you asked them
to move south of the river.
By their very nature
creative businesses thrive on the buzz and energy
of their surroundings and working environment and
they feed off each other, which is why Soho
remains the beating heart of this industry.
Soho is, after all,
an internationally-renown sub-brand of London
which can help businesses woo overseas clients. A
W1 postcode still adds kudos and credibility to
any company prepared to absorb the high rents and
growing security fears that go with such a
high-profile address.
Yet the balance of
power could be shifting as a move to less
salubrious areas of the capital appeals to an
increasing number of businesses.
Creative hubs are
springing up across the city as film, television,
advertising and design companies are priced out of
traditionally popular areas. It means places where
their directors once feared to tread are being
viewed more positively, helped by lower rents and
millions of pounds of regeneration investment.
One area which could
certainly rival Soho and places like Hoxton within
a few years is the SE1 district, traditionally
home to a number of large media owners. Premises
in King’s Cross in the north, Brixton and Deptford
in the south and Shoreditch in the east are also
being considered.
“Property prices are
fuelling the creation of these clusters. That is
why people went to Hoxton in North London in the
nineties,” says John Howkins, author of the 2001
book The Creative Economy. “When landlords have
empty buildings to fill you see the artists move
in first before other creatives take advantage of
cheap rents. Then cafes and bars arrive as a place
gets a reputation for being funky and trendy.
London is full of creative nooks and crannies
these days.”
Location branding
consultant Niclas Ljungberg adds: “Creative
businesses in general tend to operate on lower
margins than other professional services so they
actively seek out – and subsequently create – the
next ‘hot’ place. Although where exactly this will
be is not always easy to spot.”
According to
Creative London, part of the London Development
Agency, the SE1 creative hub stretches along the
River Thames from the Design Museum at Tower
Bridge to near Battersea Powerstation and is
already worth more than £0.5bn a year.
One reason SE1 has
attracted so much interest is the work of the Coin
Street Community Builders, the not-for-profit
development trust which has been regenerating 13
acres of prime land on London’s South Bank since
1984.
It runs from
Waterloo Bridge to Blackfriars Bridge, touching
the Royal National Theatre and almost reaching the
old Bankside power station, now the Tate Modern.
The central point of the whole project is the
renovated Oxo Tower in the former Stamford Wharf
which today boasts fashionable restaurants and
galleries.
Marketing and media
agency Spirit IC relocated from Covent Garden to
Great Suffolk Street in Southwark before moving
again to Winchester Walk near Borough Market.
Managing director Mike Berry says the rent in SE1
is less than £35 per square foot compared with the
£45 per square foot he would expect to pay in
Soho.
“Clients did ask us
why we wanted to move south of the river but the
redevelopment of Borough Market has helped the
image of the area. Of course, Covent Garden still
has an emotional pull for our senior people,” says
Berry.
Maverick Marketing &
Design also moved out of Soho to SE1. It went
first to Shad Thames and is now in Weston Street
in a building once home to London’s leather
market. “Soho had become too expensive for us and
I was worried about the safety of my staff,” says
managing director Carron Edmonds. “There is a
different ethos in this business nowadays and
clients are no longer so impressed by a flash West
End agency. And we are only a 10 minute walk from
London Bridge.”
Also near London
Bridge is PR and copywriting agency Red Lorry
Yellow Lorry which left Warwick Street in Soho in
November for offices in Bermondsey Street. It
doubled its office space for a third of the cost
as its rent dropped to £23 per square foot.
Head of Creative
London, Graham Hitchen, is working closely with
planning authorities to attract even more creative
businesses to SE1. “There is such a strong culture
of creativity and art here already that businesses
want to connect with the vibrancy of the area,” he
says.
Of course, SE1 is
not the only creative hub emerging out of Soho’s
shadows. Creative London has identified 10
geographical areas where non-profit organisations
have a remit to support the creative industries.
The thinking within local government is that
attracting creative companies improves the image
an area which will subsequently boost a borough’s
wider economy.
Creative North
London covering the boroughs of Barnet, Enfield,
Haringey and Waltham Forest launched a 280-studio
complex in Wood Green on November 18.
East London is also
tempting creative businesses. Advertising giants
Mother and Wieden & Kennedy have moved from Soho
to designer offices in Shoreditch where rents are
around £20 per square foot.
Meanwhile one of
London’s newest film and television production
companies Spectrecom Films set up in SE8 at
Deptford Creek in the summer rather than join its
rivals in Soho, Acton or Park Royal.
Managing director
Andrew Greener acknowledges that being the only
studio in this part of London is a risk. “Deptford
is very affordable at just £4.50 per square foot
and, as a low budget area, it could take off like
Hoxton did a few years ago. The low rents mean we
can be extremely competitive when trying to entice
new clients,” he says.
Another organisation
nurturing creative hubs around London is the
Centre for Creative Business, the 18-month old
joint venture between the London Business School
and University of the Arts London. Chief executive
and former ITN programme editor Greg Orme says
clustering of creative businesses is vital to the
future success of the industry. “The creative
sector nationally is growing at between 6 per cent
and 8 per cent a year and because it is leveraging
people and their skills their proximity to each
other is incredibly important,” he says.
So what about those
companies that refuse to leave the comfort zone of
Soho?
Advertising agency Bartle Bogle
Hegarty is based in Kingly Street, W1, and
out-going managing director Derek Robson is
convinced the agency would suffer if it moved.
“Our clients and staff want the agency to be
central and we are close to all the facilities we
need,” he says. “Some of our heritage would also
be lost if we left the area. I believe every
creative company would choose to be in Soho if it
could afford |
|
|
|
FINANCIAL TIMES December 14 2004 Page 6-7 |
|
If
you were walking around one of Beijing’s busy
shopping malls in October you would have heard
Prodigy’s controversial song Smack My Bitch Up
blaring out of one particular retailer.
What makes this unusual is that China’s Ministry
of Culture has actually banned the track from
sale because it considers the lyrics offensive.
A fair point, some might say, but Cyndi Lauper
suffered the same fate when the censors decided
her song I Drove All Night sent out a
potentially dangerous message to motorists.
Meanwhile, the Rolling Stones were ordered to
remove four songs from the Chinese release of
the band’s last compilation album 40 Licks.
Yet copies of all these tracks are available in
China if you look hard enough because a
staggering 95 per cent of music sales are pirate
copies. In fact, the government’s insistence
that any foreign record label must submit for
approval a translation of all lyrics is partly
blamed for fuelling the illegal trade as
millions of Chinese satisfy their hunger for
Western artists.
China may have the largest music piracy market
in the world valued at around $600m (source:
IFPI) but it is still the second biggest
legitimate music market in Asia, worth $101.6m.
This is a long way behind Japan ‘s $2.4bn but as
China opens up to foreign investment prior to
the 2008 Olympics in Beijing and the 2010 World
Expo in Shanghai, international record companies
are eyeing China’s long-term sales potential.
China’s legal music business has seen
double-digit growth in each of the last three
years since its accession to the World Trade
Organisation in 2001. This was the year Sony
Music established the first Chinese-foreign
joint record company in the region, Shanghai
Epic Music Entertainment, and now all the major
record companies have offices in the country.
What makes the major and independent record
companies optimistic about the future is the
Chinese government has started to understand the
importance of the music industry to the economy.
When the copyright and trademark laws were
tightened in 2001 the number of raids on pirate
operations in the major cities such as the rock
and dance capital Beijing and China’s home of
classical and jazz Shanghai increased
significantly. Tougher state regulations
relating to copyright and intellectual property
are due to be published before the end of
December.
In preparation for the new laws UK royalties
collection society PPL (Phonographic Performance
Ltd) met with the fledgling Chinese equivalent
the China Audio Video Association a few weeks
ago to help it set up a system similar to the UK
model for collecting performance and broadcast
royalties. This move will benefit overseas
rights owners significantly if the government
cracks down harder on the pirates who often
operate copying machines out of the back of
mobile vans.
The UK independent labels that visited China in
October under the umbrella of the Association of
Independent Music (AIM) must realise they cannot
expect an early return from any investment they
make next year.
Sales and royalty revenues from China will
remain tiny compared to other parts of the world
for some time, while a strict licensing quota
system remains in place to limit the number of
foreign releases. It means smaller record
companies may have to be content with getting
their artists’ tracks on compilations rather
than trying to compete head-on with the majors
for the few hundred album licences awarded by
the Chinese government each year.
The independents have identified other areas
from which their acts could earn revenue from
China’s 1.3bn population, of which 300m are now
referred to as middle class and have disposable
income to spend on music.
One possible route will be partnerships with
international brands that are also looking to
raise their profile and sales in China. The idea
is that global brands will sponsor tours, ask
international artists to endorse their products
- a popular trend in China - and pay
synchronisation fees to use tracks in
advertisements. Heineken has already sponsored
concerts, club tours and DJ competitions in the
big cities and artists have even been known to
endorse toilets.
…..(full article: www.ft.com) |
|
|
|
The Guardian Monday May 21
2007 |
|
|
|
The power of persuasion |
|
|
|
Advertisers are now looking to
engage consumers rather than annoy them - so
expect a wacky stunt soon in a street near you
|
|
|
|
Steve Hemsley |
If you are one of the lucky ones Tim Seager will
buy you a drink this summer.
Scottish & Newcastle's marketing director has
agreed that thousands of pints of Foster's, John
Smith's, Kronenbourg 1664, Strongbow and six
other drinks brands should be handed out at
pubs, nightclubs and off-licences across the
country.
High-profile television advertising is no longer
enough for Seager who has become more sensitive
about meeting drinkers' needs. For the third
year running he has sanctioned a massive
face-to-face experiential marketing campaign
called The Biggest Round, and the budget has
doubled to £7m.
Brand loyalty
Like many companies S&N knows it can no longer
rely on interrupting our lives with advertising.
The knack now is to engage us instead using
clever experiences that touch our senses. Think
everything from Innocent Drinks' now defunct
Fruitstock music festival and its new Village
Fete event in August to the Canderel Style Cafe
where shoppers enjoy beauty treatments while
eating fruit and yoghurt sprinkled with the
low-calorie sweetener.
Experiential marketing is all about creating
relevant, memorable, interactive and emotional
occasions that should increase sales and brand
loyalty.
For Seager this means giving customers a brand
experience in the places where they actually buy
alcohol. Money has been diverted from television
advertising - where spend remains unchanged
since 2005 - and on-pack sales promotions.
Between now and the end of August, a 250-strong
S&N promotions team, supplied by the
experiential agency BEcause, will visit 6,000
pubs and 1,000 shops talking to 1.2 million
drinkers. This is 300,000 more than Seager set
his sights on last year.
The reps will chat to pub-goers about their
drinking habits and lifestyle choices, and then
buy them a drink. People who see themselves as
laid-back about life will be told that Foster's
is the lager for them. The agent will ensure the
drink is served in the right glass and at the
correct temperature.
"This is about getting close to people to
discover why they drink what they do and
persuading them to try something new," says
Seager. "We must ensure our marketing budget
falls on fertile ground."
There are some concerns about the S&N campaign.
Unlike selling alcohol, letting people sample it
does not require a licence. Seager insists
BEcause staff should not approach anyone who is
drunk or under 18, and pub-goers will be only
allowed one half pint. Shoppers will receive
smaller 15ml samples.
Such is the interest in everything experiential
that many marketing, advertising and PR agencies
now feel the urge to challenge the specialists
and offer the service themselves.
They argue that they too have the skills to
tailor a campaign that can fit an advertiser's
message around how a consumer is feeling
emotionally at a particular time in a specific
location, whether that is the Glastonbury music
festival or the Bluewater shopping centre.
Field marketing company CPM has its experiential
arm Mango, media agency OMD Group has its
branded content wing Fuse and Publicis has
Saatchi & Saatchi X. Sales promotion agency BD-NTWK
has plans to create its own specific
experiential division headed by Ian Bushell.
While at specialist agency Ignition, Bushell was
behind experiences such as the Nokia New Year's
Eve global music event last December, which was
held across four continents.
The Direct Marketing Association (DMA) has
confirmed it may launch an Experiential
Marketing Council to support a sector that
industry estimates claim is now worth more than
£200m. This is, however, still less than 1% of
the total UK advertising spend, which topped
£19bn for the first time in 2006, according to
the Advertising Association's latest figures.
The DMA's final decision hinges on whether its
Experiential Marketing Committee can get the
sixth paid-up member it needs to become an
official council and win a place on the DMA
board.
This could happen on June 5 when Kevin Jackson,
sales and marketing director of experiential
specialist Jack Morton Worldwide, is due to
attend a committee meeting. If Jackson can be
convinced to sign up, it will release DMA
promotional funds to persuade more advertisers
to connect with consumers on a more emotional
level.
That seat at the DMA top table will go to
committee chairman Wendy Hooper, managing
director of Carbon Marketing. Carbon created an
experience for Nestlé's Double Cream bars
featuring a deliberately jack-knifed lorry in
Covent Garden which spilled thousands of
chocolate bars onto the street, creating a moral
dilemma for passers-by who were tempted to take
one.
It is Hooper's aim to win over the specialists
and any agency with an experiential marketing
arm. "It is important we all speak the same
language," she says.
She will hope for better luck than the Live
Brand Experience Association, which folded last
September amid fierce criticism that some
members were too busy protecting their own
interests, rather than working with each other
to promote what is still a young medium.
Social networks
Advertisers are certainly weighing up the merits
of experiential campaigns. A survey of 154
senior marketers by business development
consultancy Reardon Smith Whittaker claims that
61% of marketing directors with a budget of more
than £1m are more interested in experiential
marketing than any other discipline. This
compares with 36% who were mostly excited by
search-engine marketing and the 13% who
preferred mobile campaigns.
Critics of experiential marketing argue the
success of any activity is difficult to measure.
Yet S&N's decision to pump more money into
face-to-face campaigns rather than TV
advertising is proving an effective strategy,
despite the unusual multi-brand approach. In
2006, 56% of consumers - almost half a million -
who took part in The Biggest Round went on to
buy a drinks brand bought for them.
Seager recognises that members of the public can
become true advocates of any brand, especially
as the power of word of mouth has moved online
thanks to blogs and social networks.
However Sharon Richey, managing director at
Because, warns there are potential pitfalls when
undertaking experiential work. "Without careful
planning you can choose the wrong venues and
approach consumers at the wrong time," she says.
"It would be pointless trying to talk to people
in a pub when they are watching football or late
in the evening when they might be drunk."
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Guardian.
Monday June 19 2006 |
|
|
|
(interview with
Virgin Radio sales director Nick Hewat) |
|
|
|
Why brainwaves
rule the airwaves |
|
|
|
Nick Hewat
insisted on star presenter Christian O’Connell
sitting in on his sales meeting with mobile
brand Orange.
The Virgin Radio
sales director is well aware of the influence
such personalities can have when trying to
convince advertisers to spend money. O’Connell
hosts Virgin’s flagship breakfast show which
Orange agreed to sponsor for 12 months from
January, but Hewat has his eyes set on a
three-year deal.
“We produced a
detailed review document pointing out what the
brand has accomplished with Virgin and why radio
is different to other media because it has a low
level of ad-avoidance,” says Hewat. “A presenter
like O’Connell can bring a brand to life on the
radio in a way that is not possible with a
static medium like a poster. He has used
creative on-air promotions that get the
listeners really involved.”
Whether Orange
extends its deal remains to be seen, but Hewat
has a right to be confident. He joined Virgin
last September from rival GCap Media’s Capital
Radio Group after five years as its head of
agency sales, yet his experience of what does
and does not work on radio stretches back much
further.
In fact, when
Virgin Radio first went on-air at 12.15pm on 30
April 1993 as Virgin 1215 playing album tracks
and rock music he had already been selling the
medium for two years.
Having been
persuaded to quit his job sifting through direct
debit and standing order forms for a high street
bank he joined the now defunct Capital
Radio-owned sales house MSM (Media Sales and
Marketing). He began learning his trade at a
time when commercial radio was attracting just
2.7% (source: RAB) of all advertising revenue
compared with 6.5% today.
He still remembers
fondly his first booking when he persuaded an
insurance company to sponsor a “car park spaces
alert” slot on local station Lincs FM in
Lincolnshire.
He left MSM in
1994 to go travelling but returned to the
company a few months later. When MSM was closed
in 1997 he remained within Capital Radio’s
new-look sales house and was soon promoted to a
group head management role before being chosen
to lead the sales team.
After all these
years committed to one medium it is new
technology such as digital radio, the internet,
podcasts and mobile phones which is changing the
way people listen that excites him nowadays.
In April more than
144,000 podcasts of Virgin Radio programmes such
as O’Connell’s breakfast show and comedian Al
Murray’s Sunday Afternoon slot were downloaded
from the station’s website as multimedia files
to listeners’ iPods, mobile phones and personal
computers so they can tune in whenever they want
to.
Virgin Radio will
be available on the digital television service
Freeview from early July while Hewat is
overseeing the re-launch of the station’s
website. He wants to maximise online advertising
revenue as people increasingly listen to the
radio via the internet.
The emergence of
digital radio is certainly good news for Virgin.
For years it has bemoaned having to market a
music station saddled with a poor quality AM
frequency.
Hewat is also
confident his bosses’ investment in new
technology will help his attempts to change the
perception that Virgin is still a “bloke’s
station”. This view has been hard to shift
because of the station’s early emphasis on rock
music, yet 43% of its audience of 2.5m adults
(source: Rajar) are women.
“Emerging
technology presents exciting opportunities for
me and the sales team but no-one is quite sure
exactly how people will listen in the future and
what commercial content will work best,” says
Hewat. “It is my job to challenge male and
female brand owners to use radio differently.”
He expects
programme sponsorship and promotions such as
on-air and online competitions rather than
traditional radio spot advertising to drive
commercial radio revenues over the next few
years.
Hewat likes to
think of himself as a radical thinker when
devising a media sales strategy. In fact, he is
more likely to find inspiration from supermarket
giant Tesco than from other radio companies.
“Radio stations must think more like retailers
and react quicker. This might mean responding to
the hot weather by securing a promotion with an
ice cream brand at very short notice,” he says.
For this month’s
FIFA World Cup Virgin Radio has followed the
example of the supermarkets by tapping into the
nation’s mood to generate extra revenue. Hewat’s
football-themed offer called Virgin Extra Time
rewards advertisers booking slots during the
tournament with 5% of additional airtime for
free.
“To succeed in
radio sales for so many years you need
integrity, intelligence and energy. If you can
display those traits and you love music too
there are few better jobs around,” says Hewat.
CV
Name: Nick Hewat
Age: 37
Education:
Attended Chesham High School and achieved eight
‘O’ Levels and 3 ‘A’ Levels in geography,
economics and English literature. Degree in
politics from Birmingham Polytechnic
Career: Brief
stint at National Westminster Bank before
joining radio sales house MSM in 1991. Left to
go travelling in 1994 but returned to MSM in
1996. Became group head within new Capital Radio
sales house in 1997 and was made head of agency
sales in 2000. Joined Virgin Radio as sales
director in September 2005.
Family: long-term
partner Karen. He has two children.
Leisure: football,
running (ran the London Marathon in 2001) and
spending time with his kids. |
|
|
|
The Guardian.
Monday June 27 2005 |
| |
|
When men swapped
their pants for shorts
John Hegarty will
forever be known as the man who introduced
British men to the joys of boxer shorts.
The 61-year
chairman and worldwide creative director at
advertising agency Bartle Bogle Hegarty created
the famous commercial for Levi’s in the
mid-eighties when Nick Kamen undressed in a
launderette to reveal his crisp white boxers as
Marvin Gaye’s I Heard It Through The Grapevine
played in the background.
Looking back over
his 40 years in advertising this is the campaign
Hegarty regards as his most successful. It not
only helped to sell a lot of Levi 501 jeans but
it also had a defining impact on the fashion and
music industries.
Men everywhere
swapped their Y-fronts for shorts and have never
gone back, while the record business suddenly
realised there was money to be made by
exploiting songs used in television advertising.
Soundtracks from seven Levi’s ads topped the UK
singles charts.
Hegarty was
honoured with a lifetime achievement award at
the 2005 Clio Awards in Miami last month. The
Clios reward outstanding creative work and
Hegarty is regarded as an advertising guru
internationally. He coined the phrase Vorsprung
Durch Technik for Audi and was the first person
to pick out a young model called Brad Pitt to
appear in a commercial, for Levi’s
in 1991.
Despite his age,
which makes him a rare beast indeed in the UK
advertising industry, and his long list of
successes Hegarty has no plans to retire. In
fact he hates the whole idea. “Society should
ban the word ‘retire’. Why would I stop doing
something I love so much? I follow a ‘keep
walking’ philosophy because life is a journey
and there is never a time when you just stop,”
he says.
He adds: “This is
the most exciting time to be in advertising.
When I started at Benton and Bowles as a junior
art director in 1965 things were much more
rigid. You only had to decide whether to produce
an ad for print, outdoor or television. Now we
have the internet and multi-channel television
and must operate in a global market.”
He was actually
fired from Benton and Bowles in 1967 before
eventually becoming a founding shareholder at
Saatchi & Saatchi in 1970 and co-founding BBH in
1982 with John Bartle and Nigel Bogle.
Today more than 60
per cent of Hegarty’s time is spent on
management issues for a group with global
billings of more than $950m. He overseas the
creative output from BBH offices in London, New
York, Tokyo, Singapore and Sao Paolo.
He is concerned
that the global nature of advertising may mean a
shortage of talented creative people in years to
come. “It is harder to be a creative these days
because you not only have to come up with new
ideas every day but these ideas must cross
geographical borders as well as traditional
boundaries like consumer attitudes and social
class.” Last year 71% of the group’s income came
from work that ran internationally.
One of his hopes
for the future is to see creative agencies
become more involved in the whole brand
communications process for clients in a way that
media agencies boast they do already. He expects
more advertising agencies to return to the old
days when media planning took place in-house,
and BBH will unveil its new internal planning
team in August. “In such a complex media world
it makes sense when talking with clients to have
planners sitting alongside the people who come
up with the ideas. I always thought it was a
huge mistake to split the two disciplines up.”
In an industry
where ageism can be an issue, Hegarty is living
proof that creativity does not die with age –
whatever your choice of underwear.
CV
Name
John Hegarty
Age
61
Education
Finchley Grammar School in North London;
Hornesey College of Art and then London College
of Printing to study graphic design. Left before
the end of the course to enter advertising
industry.
Career
Joined Benton and Bowles in London in 1965 but
was fired 18 months later. Went to small Soho
agency John Collings & Partners and then to
Cramer Saatchi consultancy. He was a founding
shareholder when it became Saatchi & Saatchi in
1970 and was appointed deputy creative director
in 1971. Left in 1973 to co-found TBWA London
and left in 1982 to start Bartle Bogle Hegarty.
Family
partner and has two grown up children from a
previous marriage
Leisure
photography, golf, art and he owns a vineyard in
Carcassonne, France
The Guardian June
27 2005
Still the best of
enemies
The Manchester
Evening News (MEN) once ran a feature on the
life of Hitler with swastikas breaking up the
text for effect. At the bottom of the page was
an advert for a client the newspaper’s media
sales team had been working hard for months to
attract – German airline Lufthansa.
If this
embarrassing moment illustrates anything it is
how editorial and advertising teams have failed
to communicate effectively with each other over
the years.
In newspaper and
magazine groups across the country the two
departments endure a love/hate relationship.
Journalists
criticise the sales department for seeing them
as the people who simply fill the space around
the ads, while classified and display executives
complain editorial staff look down on them and
believe salesmen would not think twice about
prostituting editorial integrity to achieve
their monthly commission.
“There is not
really any malice on either side but there is a
lack of understanding about how difficult each
other’s job is. Journalists see advertising as
the spawn of the devil but they need to
appreciate the commercial realities of the
publications they write for,” says Andy
Sutcliffe, former editor and chief for IPC’s
music and sports group and now publisher of
Hanage Publishing’s Stag & Groom magazine.
Tom Toher,
director at media sales recruitment consultancy
Carreras Lathane, spent 13 years selling ad
space. He says the main difference between
editorial and advertising is that journalists
can let the phone ring. “Editors do have
unreasonable expectations of how easy it is for
media sales guys to get through to decision
makers just because they have no difficulty
getting hold of people,” he says.
There are rare
occasions when people will move from media sales
to editorial and vice-versa, and they will
sympathise with both departments.
Chris Ingham
started life as a staff writer on music magazine
Metal Hammer before switching to become sales
executive, advertising manager and now publisher
of the Future Plc title. One person moving in
the opposite direction is James Livesey who left
IPC’s Country Life magazine where he was a
classified sales executive to become a reporter
at Haymarket-owned Media Week.
“I was quite good
at media sales but felt I was more suited to
journalism. When I asked my sales director for
a reference to get on a journalism course he was
not very happy about it,” says Livesey.
“Reporters who complain about how difficult it
is to get information need to imagine how hard
it can be getting money out of people.”
Yet as the battle
for readers and advertisers intensifies,
editorial and advertising sales teams will have
to work more closely together. Many publishers
now send journalists and sales staff on the same
training courses to try and spark ideas.
“We must offer
advertisers more than the chance to slap their
logo on an article or feature, and this means
working on a number of levels requiring
editorial involvement. Better lines of
communication are leading to more sensible
discussions,” says Mark Rix, deputy managing
director at the MEN.
Examples of
effective collaboration include
Gillette sponsoring sections of the Mirror and
converting the female-targeted 3am magazine into
‘3pm’ to promote its M3 Power Razor to male
sports fans.
Regionally, the MEN produced an
edition in ‘Selfridges yellow’ for the store’s
opening at the Trafford Centre.
The days when an
advertising executive could contact a client and
book a series of 12 monthly ads at full rate
card prices are a distant memory for most. The
challenge for media sales staff today is to
reassure their journalist colleagues that any
commercial activity will not upset the readers
or damage the editorial brand. |
|
The
Guardian September 2002 |
|
Catching Them
Young – charities are targeting those elusive
donors in the 20s and 30s |
|
Singer Geri Halliwell never misses an
opportunity to tell young women to check their
breasts.
As patron of Breast Cancer Care's Lavender Trust
the former Spice Girl - who suffered her own
breast cancer scare when she was 19 - regularly
takes time out from her solo career to talk
about the condition.
Her involvement is significant because it has
raised the charity's profile among women and men
under 35, an age group who traditionally donate
proportionately less to good causes than the
rest of the population. Around 30% of UK homes
give to charity every fortnight, according to
the Institute for Fiscal Studies, yet while a
third of people in their 60s donate, the figure
for those in their 20s is just one in five. This
trend is threatening the long-term financial
health of many voluntary organisations because
social and economic changes over the past 20
years mean charities can no longer afford to
rely so heavily on their traditional supporters.
The IFS says the middle-aged feel insecure in
their jobs and have reined in their giving,
while the Charities Aid Foundation points out
that as more pensioners are asked to pay for
their nursing care, the level of legacy income -
currently around 40% of all charity revenue -
will become harder to forecast.
The response of not-for-profit organisations is
to invest more in non-traditional marketing
techniques such as face-to-face recruitment on
the high street and email and text- messaging
campaigns devised to persuade the young to dig
deeper into their pockets.
"Charities are aware they must target teenagers
and those in their 20s and 30s sooner rather
than later because they need to attract new
donors and encourage committed giving," says
Andrew Watt, head of policy and standards at the
Institute of Charity Fundraising Managers.
Stopping people in the street and asking them to
set up a direct debit or standing order in
support of a specific charity is a controversial
new method of fundraising, yet it is succeeding
in obtaining donations from younger people in a
way that collection tins never have.
The ICFM claims voluntary organisations spent an
additional 45% last year attracting donors in
this way, and of the near-500,000 people who
signed up, 85% were under 35. Greenpeace
registered 25,000 people using street campaigns
in 2001 and more than half of these were in
their 20s and 30s.
"This is often a young person's first contact
with a cause they agree with but which they have
never found the time to support financially. The
technique prompts them into action," says Watt.
An agency employed by a charity to recruit
donors is usually paid a fee of around £60 for
every person it registers or it will charge for
the time its staff are on the streets. This
overhead is usually covered by the first year of
monthly donations.
There is a fear that the public will become
turned off by this method if it is seen as too
intrusive and the high street is saturated with
charities on donor recruitment drives. In an
attempt to avoid the type of negative publicity
and complaints suffered by the utility companies
that tout for business in town centres, more
than 60 charities, the charity commission and
the Home Office have formed the public
fundraising regulatory association which is
drafting an industry code of conduct. While
on-street recruitment is attracting the young in
vast numbers, charities also expect new media to
generate extra funds.
World Vision, the child sponsorship charity
providing aid for famine victims in Africa, has
obtained the details of more than 55,000
teenagers via text-messaging promotions on its
web pages and is considering raising money by
charging visitors to access mobile phone ring
tones and logos from the internet site.
The Giving Campaign, established by the
voluntary sector and the government last year to
increase the amount of money given to UK
charities, is also focusing much of its activity
on the young and is drafting plans for a charity
week in 2003 to persuade schools to get
involved.
Barnardo's is extending its own fundraising
programme linked to primary schools and
university rag weeks. It is also introducing
extra event-based activities such as treks to
Kenya and Spain this year to attract the
attention of the energetic twenty- and thirty-somethings.
"The creative work for our TV advertising
campaign uses more shocking and contemporary
content than usual in a deliberate move to
target a younger audience," says Nicky Kenny,
its product manager for fundraising.
Young people will give money to a good cause if
they can relate to the work it does, as the
£220m raised by the eight Comic Relief red nose
days demonstrates. Getting them to donate more
regularly is the challenge for most individual
charities who, unlike Breast Cancer Care, do not
enjoy the benefits of Girl Power. |
|
|
|
The Independent January 17 2005 page 17
Dome Improvements
David Campbell has few regrets in his life but
buying a 15th Century pub in West Sussex is one
of his biggest.
There is nothing wrong with The Hollist Arms at
Lodsworth. In fact, with its real ales and log
fires it is a perfect country bolt-hole for
media-types.
The former Virgin Radio chief bought the inn in
a radical and rather impulsive move soon after
overseeing the sale of Ginger Media, the company
he co-owned with the unpredictable DJ Chris
Evans and Richard Branson, to Scottish Media
Group (SMG) for £225m in 2000.
Yet the man handed responsibility for
transforming the much-maligned London Dome from
white elephant capital landmark into leading
entertainment and possible Olympic venue is no
fan of the licensing trade.
He rates the experience of spending long hours
pulling pints for locals for limited financial
return as unpleasant as being summoned in 2003
to appear at the High Court. He was called as a
witness for Evans in the DJ’s failed £8.6m
damages claim against Virgin Radio after its
parent SMG sacked him. The cross-examination
Campbell faced is still a painful memory.
He has long since called time on his life as a
publican and returned to what he knows best
which is media, marketing and entertainment.
What he has learnt from his past mistakes is not
to rush into business decisions. He thought
carefully before accepting the offer to become
ceo of Anschutz Entertainment Group UK, the US
owners of the Dome.
Anschutz is working with joint venture
regeneration company Meridian Delta to turn the
Greenwich site into a thriving entertainment
destination. It needed someone with strong
credentials to change attitudes towards the Dome
which has suffered from years of poor publicity
and consumer derision. Last week the National
Audit Office announced the building had cost
taxpayers £28.7m to maintain and sell in the
four years since it was closed.
Work will begin in June to create a
22,000-seater music and sports arena which will
host basketball and gymnastics should London
stage the 2012 Olympic Games. A super casino
could also be based there.
Campbell’s knowledge of marketing London
undoubtedly helped him get the job. Since 2003
his achievements as ceo of Visit London, the
marketing and promotion tourist agency which is
effectively the rebranded London Tourist Board,
has made him a firm favourite with Mayor of
London Ken Livingstone.
Livingstone agreed Campbell’s salary of around
£250,000 a year with a potential 20% performance
related bonus which made him the highest paid
executive in the UK visitor industry. In the
first six months of 2004 international visitors
to London rose to 6.1m compared with 5.3m in the
same period the year before.
“If you are good at marketing and understand
media you can promote any brand. It is harder to
market something which has not lived up to
expectations. The Dome will need to shout loudly
about its content,” says Campbell.
If you combine Campbell’s passion for London
with his previous experience it becomes clear
why Anschutz wanted him so badly.
He spent five years marketing big brands such as
Pepsi before joining the Virgin Group in 1986
and becoming the founding ceo of Virgin Radio in
1993. He formed Ginger Media with Evans and co
in 1997 and did very nicely thank you out of the
deal to sell the company and with it Virgin
Radio to SMG.
He left SMG within weeks of the agreement being
signed to dabble in the world of the pub
landlord and try his hand as a venture
capitalist. He became executive vice chairman of
music company Ministry of Sound and later
non-executive chairman of Zenith Entertainment,
the company behind shows such as CD:UK and
Inspector Morse.
Talk to those who have worked with him before
and they recall a man who is quick-thinking and
dynamic, if somewhat erratic and bad-tempered if
things do not go his way. “When he takes on a
job he has a vision of what he ultimately wants
to achieve, but you do have to tread very
carefully around him if he is in a bad mood,”
says a former director at Virgin Radio.
Another ex-colleague describes Campbell as
someone people listen to and who gets things
done in his own way. “He is the right choice for
the Dome because he can come up with big ideas
to make things happen. But I remember how he
would work long into the night and sometimes
miss meetings during the day.”
It is Campbell’s love of television as a medium
which could be crucial in changing perceptions
of the Dome as a waste of public money…(full
text: www.independent.co.uk) |
|
|
World Cup - Why football is more
than a man's game
Research shows that football's
popularity among women is on the rise, with
almost nine million watching the big games on
TV. Steve Hemsley examines how advertisers are
tapping into the trend.
Two of the biggest myths in
football are that English players don't dive and
away teams never get a penalty at Manchester
United's Old Trafford stadium. Once upon a time,
these may both have been true. Another popular
fairy tale long past its sell-by date is that
women hate football, with the consequence being
that television will get the cold shoulder from
them come World Cup time. But according to
analysis by the various media and agency insight
teams and market research companies, this
presumption is simply no longer the case.
In fact, the results may shock
the owners of female-oriented brands, many of
which are considering deserting the small screen
during the month-long tournament in Germany and
switching their budgets to April and May, or to
other media altogether.
"There is certainly a
misconception that women are not interested in
football and clients are very interested in the
data that proves otherwise," says Carat's head
of insight planning, Jeremy Paul.
"Many women watch games with
their partner, or in a group, and advertisers
need to understand this trend, but be clear
about a woman's mindset when she is watching
football. This means saying the right things
about the right brands in this context."
According to TGI, 36% of women
(8.9 million) now watch football on television,
up from 16% in 2001, while 41% (10.1 million)
claim to have an interest in the game.
Useful indicator
ITV's overall coverage of the
World Cup in Japan and Korea in 2002 reached 84%
of all women, even though kick-off times tended
to be at unsociable times. However, a glance
back to what happened during Euro 2004 in
Portugal is probably a more useful indicator of
how many women could be watching England's bid
for global glory this June.
Indeed, according to researcher
Sports Marketing Surveys, 42% of viewers
watching Euro 2004 on television in the UK were
female.
MindShare represents a number of
clients which will aim to reach females during
June, including cosmetic brand Dove, which
advertised on TV during the previous World Cup
finals.
Managing partner at MindShare
Insights, Doreen Dignan, is convinced more women
will be watching this World Cup than viewed the
previous event or Euro 2004. "Our research shows
almost one in four women watched at least three
minutes of 10 or more matches in Portugal. The
World Cup is a bigger tournament and the timing
of the games will boost ratings overall,
including among women," she says.
Carat Insight has pinpointed
that the UK population fell into two distinct
camps: Euro 2004-philes (36%) and Euro
2004-phobes (46%), with the remaining 18% not
caring one way or the other. More than a quarter
of the Euro 2004-philes were women, with 53% of
them watching the final - and England were not
even playing.
Of course, the level of
attention during matches did differ between men
and women, with 38% of men closely watching
every ball kicked compared to 19% of women.
Another agency providing useful
research for its female-brand clients, such as
Revlon, is PHD. Head of media insights Jenny
Lightfoot says only 2% of women really went out
of their way to avoid the last World Cup and
that around half of them watched at least three
minutes of five matches.
"When the England team does
well, it inspires everyone in the country and it
is wrong to assume women will not be watching
the national team on television," she says.
"Also, the England players and even the manager
are celebrities appearing regularly in the
women's glossies and this will also draw in the
non-core football audience."
At the end of February, OMD UK
carried out an online survey to see how
passionate women were about the forthcoming
World Cup. The results suggest interest in
football is crossing over age groups and is more
accessible to women than four years ago,
particularly among younger females. When asked
whether they were passionate about football, 22%
of women aged 25 to 34 said they were, compared
with only 8% of those aged 35 to 44. Some 50% of
women under 24 now identify themselves as
England fans and 61% of all women questioned
will be watching some matches. "When you look at
who is in the crowds at games, it's still mainly
men and this helps to perpetuate the myth, but
football engages with women at home more than we
may think," says head of OMD Insight Jo Rigby.
The large amount of research
available to brands could certainly change the
balance of female/male brands advertising during
this World Cup compared with 2002. At the last
tournament, 34 of the top 50 advertisers on ITV
in June were male-biased: car, beer, finance or
DIY brands, compared with only 12 during the
same month last year when there was no major
international football tournament. However,
female brands that did book airtime during June
2002 included Unilever's Persil, retailer Boots
and Dove.
One OMD UK client considering
its agency's findings is hair removal brand Veet,
whose core audience is women aged 16 to 34 and
which counts June as one of its most important
sales months. OMD UK associate director Simon
Brockman says he will be looking again at the
media strategy for Veet following the research.
"We buy women targets, but the
cost of advertising around England games will
probably still be too prohibitive for a brand
like Veet despite the numbers of women it
appears will be watching the football," he says.
The cost of advertising to women
around World Cup matches may be the deciding
factor for many brands. In June 2002, television
revenue went up by 13% year on year, which
offset the increase in male viewing generated by
so much football that the price of men ratings
actually fell by 1.3%. By contrast, the extra
13% was divided by a smaller number of female
impacts, for which the price went up by 23.4%
for housewives, 35.2% for housewives with
children and 25.7% for women overall.
Rescheduling June's television
money into April and May by female-oriented
brands could also inflate the airtime prices in
those months. This trend could prompt media
agencies to switch more of their clients' money
to other media such as magazines.
The PPA's consultant Tim Lucas
says the media agencies he is talking to expect
the cost of reaching women on television during
June to increase by between 25% and 35% and that
magazines will therefore be around five times
cheaper for advertisers.
Red herring
"The number of women watching
football is really a red herring for
advertisers, because it is all about value for
money," he says. "A brand could buy around six
weeks of airtime on television or advertise to
the same weight of women in magazines for six
months."
IPC's advertising marketing
manager, James Papworth, says agencies should
use the NRS Readership Accumulation Study to
plan their magazine ratings weekly in the same
way they would TV. "ITV1 will again be very much
wall-to-wall football in June and advertisers
targeting female consumers will face higher
prices and lower ratings - if they can get on
air at all," he says.
Elsewhere, radio stations will
also be working hard to encourage female brands
during June. But Nick Hewat, sales director at
Virgin Radio, says large brand owners such as
P&G will still need a lot of convincing not to
switch their FMCG radio advertising into May and
leave June to be dominated by male brands.
Of course, there are still lots
of women who do not like football and many
brands will be looking to advertise on
television during complementary programming.
When an evening match is being shown on the BBC,
ITV will be showing a drama or film. Other
broadcasters too, such as the Flextech and UKTV
channels, are planning packages for advertisers
to reach female audiences not interested in the
World Cup.
Yet, in reality, more women than
advertisers perhaps realise have always liked
watching football and can be just as passionate
about the game as men, especially when the
national team is playing. This is particularly
true during the World Cup, when the media will
be full of little else.
WHEN WOMEN WILL BE WATCHING
35% According to Sports
Marketing Surveys, female viewers accounted for
between 35% and 40% of the audience during
television coverage of England's qualifying
matches for the 2006 World Cup.
3.5m SMS director John Bushell
says this equates to as many as 3.5 million
women watching England's group matches. Bushell
adds: "It's clear the World Cup is a good
mechanic for advertisers targeting women." But
it all depends on how many people will be
watching on commercial television ...
42% During Euro 2004, 42% of
viewers watching on either channel in the UK
were female. The BBC is still top dog when it
comes to viewers of either sex though. According
to MediaTel, 3.5 million people watched the
England-Brazil game in 2002 on ITV, with 12.5
million watching it on the Beeb.
Media Week |
|
|
Media Week October 5 2004 Page 32
The media jobs from hell
San Francisco Zoo used to have an elephant
called Calle who needed a specially-developed
suppository to treat a chronic illness.
One zoo worker had to wear a full-arm glove to
administer the 10 inch long, 4lb cocoa-butter
bullets twice a day and was often left covered
in elephant excrement. What was arguably one of
the worst jobs in the world came to an end in
March when, sadly, Calle had to be put to sleep.
Jobs from hell in media sales rarely involve
having to put your arm up an elephant’s
backside, but for anyone who has worked on an
obscure media title, dealt with obnoxious
clients or had a nightmare boss this industry
can be almost as unpleasant - if thankfully not
as smelly.
Next time your job is getting you down think of
the poor sales reps at one national newspaper
who were locked in a cupboard by their manager
if they failed to reach their targets. Or spare
a thought for those MW readers who remember
working for a certain newspaper publisher where
on closing day sales staff were refused a chair
to sit on, could not go to the toilet or have a
cigarette break until they had made a certain
number of bookings.
You might wonder why any self-respecting human
being would put up with these appalling working
conditions, yet such bad experiences are more
common than you might imagine.
One former employee of a now defunct small
publishing house in South London recalls one
time he was on the phone and his boss stood over
him looking irritated and waving a wad of £50
notes under his nose. The rep put his caller on
hold and was told by his irate manager that if
he knew he would get this pile of money for
closing the deal he would have done so by now.
The salesman promptly made a sale but never got
the money, just more abuse. He left the company
soon afterwards.
Another reader recollects working for a business
to business magazine publisher where if you
returned from a meeting with an advertising
agency without any orders the advertising
manager would demand you make another
appointment for the following week. This policy
backfired in a big way because the agencies
being hassled became so annoyed they refused to
take calls from any rep working on the company’s
various magazines.
Despite these horror stories it is perhaps
understandable why most people are reluctant to
publicly name and shame dreadful workplaces or
bad bosses for fear their paths may cross again
during their media sales career. However, some
individuals are willing to go on the record and
recount their tales of employment woe.
Total Media’s senior account manager, Rupen
Shah, remembers a spell working for a publisher
based in Holborn in the mid-nineties. It was his
first job after he completed his European
Business studies in France. The role was to sell
advertising in magazines covering the Chinese
transport and constructions industries on behalf
of the Chinese government.
“I never actually saw copies of the magazines
and I kept thinking I would get that elusive
booking, but it never happened. My £100-a-week
salary kept me going for three months after
which I finally gave up having made no sales
despite even attempting to sell to people in
French,” he says. “The office in Holborn was
smoke-filled with some weird characters and in
the end I decided to spend the rest of the
summer with my girlfriend. It put me off media
sales for life.”
Working for niche trade magazines, the sort
featured on the cultural news quiz Have I Got
News For You, can test any media sales person
wanting to prove his or her worth however
talented they might be.
MW’s own recently recruited display sales
executive, Estella Scolding, joined from Guild
of Master Craftsmen Publications, a hugely
successful niche publishing house which produces
a host of woodworking and knitting related
titles.
“I worked on Knitting Magazine and Machine
Knitting News and had to talk to people who know
nothing about advertising. You could drown them
with figures that you knew would help them
generate new business but it made no difference.
You also had to pretend you were knowledgeable
about knitting and the different designers. It
was not enough to know their industry inside
out; you also had to be passionate about
particular products. I know knitting excites
some people but it was not my cup of tea,” she
says. (full text: www.mediaweek.co.uk) |
Media Week
February 2005 Page 28
How to sabotage and ad campaign
The armchair football fan is a notoriously
fickle creature which is why Five booked
tactical pitch perimeter advertising during
Blackburn Rover’s Uefa Cup tie away at Olympique
Lyonnaise televised by BBC1 a few years back.
The aim was to sabotage the Beeb’s footie
coverage by informing viewers there was a much
better match – Liverpool’s 5-0 rout of FC Kosice
– on the other side.
The BBC could have no complaints about what was
a totally legal and clever spoiling tactic by
Five to directly target its audience using media
information which was publicly available.
Subsequent audience research revealed the
perimeter board enticed 143,000 BBC1 switchers
to Five in the minute following its first
exposure - and before the BBC’s sports producer
realised what was happening and confiscated the
offending advert.
Rival companies and brands love to outdo each
other and finding ways to disrupt each other’s
advertising and marketing activity is a popular
tactic.
Sport is the perfect arena for such spoiling
fun. During the Olympic Games in Barcelona, for
instance, Nike bought all the poster sites from
the airport into the city so visitors would
think that it, rather than Adidas, was the
event’s main brand sponsor.
Nevertheless, mention the word “sabotage” to
clients and marketing directors can shift
nervously in their seats; worried any clever
idea could backfire on them and their brand. Yet
if there is humour involved and the facts are
checked thoroughly - particularly in the case of
price comparison advertising - this can be an
effective course of action. No-one gets hurt and
consumers love it.
Traditionally it is the market leader in any
industry which tends to be on the wrong end of
sabotage activity as challenger brands seize any
opportunity to take a punch at the big boys.
Take British Airways and Virgin Atlantic who
have been at each others’ throats for years.
Virgin can get away with introducing sick bags
with ethnic designs to draw attention to the
ill-fated cultural tail designs on BA planes,
and erecting billboards proclaiming Heathrow as
‘Virgin Territory’ when it was finally awarded
slots at the airport. If BA attacked Virgin in a
similar cheeky way its efforts would probably
fall flat because consumers expect it to rise
above such antics.
“Before entering this area an advertiser must
ask itself if it is being mischievous or
defensive. Challenger brands can be naughty
while brand leaders will always be looking over
their shoulder. That is just the way it is,”
says Crawford Hollingworth, ceo of brand
research consultancy Headlight Vision.
Brands can generate respect if they are
perceived by consumers as the sharp underdog,
but Hollingworth warns there must be a weakness
in the big brand’s product or service to attack.
“Otherwise you can just end up looking like a
little dog yapping at the market leader’s
heels,” he says.
The end of BT’s monopoly for directory enquiries
is another example where challenger brands could
get away with having a dig. Immediately after
de-regulation 118 118 ran full page ads
parodying BT in the same editions of newspapers
being used by BT for its press campaign. The ads
were headlined Public Notice and mentioned
services that ‘BT 192 never bothered to
offer’…(full text: www.mediaweek.co.uk)
“Any company which has previously enjoyed a
monopoly is fair game for sabotage, but the key
thing is the message. You have to do it from the
consumer champion angle and be cheeky for it to
work. Basically you need a sense of humour and
style,” says Yusuf Chuku, lead strategist at
Element Communications, the recent joint venture
between ad agency WCRS and Naked Communications
whose client list includes The Number 118 118.
Obtaining details of a rival’s planned
advertising is not as difficult as you might
imagine. The media village breeds gossip and
feeds on rumour, and good creatives and planners
will always have their ears to the ground.
Reports in the press will also alert companies
to planned competitor activity ripe for
sabotage, while new employees recruited from an
opponent are a valuable source of information.
“Good planners are aware of what is going on;
they have their periscopes up and are listening
and watching the industry and keeping in touch
with the national and international news. They
will spot opportunities where clients could
benefit from the media activities of others, but
any sabotage will only work if the advertiser
and its media and creative agencies work closely
together to get the message right,” says Nick
Hammond, planning director at Total Media.
One popular and opportunistic form of sabotage
is piggy-backing someone else’s advertising.
This can be a cost-effective way for large and
small brands to generate awareness and media
coverage. Often one advertiser’s creative can
prompt copy-cat thinking from businesses in
non-competitive sectors which will benefit both
parties.
Take the Wonderbra campaign featuring Eva
Herzigova in her underwear with the message
“Hello Boys” and designed to be a head-turner
among male consumers. The idea was adopted and
adapted by Guinness which used the slightly less
attractive sight of comedian Billy Connelly
holding two bottles of Kaliber alcohol-free
lager. |
|
|
|
Marketing Week September 9 2004 Page 47
Finding motivation
Chelsea’s new manager Jose Mourinho believes
motivation is arguably more important than
ability when it comes to creating a winning
team.
The man given the task of spending Roman
Abramovich’s millions to steal the Premiership
crown from London rivals Arsenal says it is not
enough to have players who can do it – they must
also want to do it.
It is a psychological theory which served him
well at European Champions Porto last season and
it is a hypothesis which employers in any UK
business can relate to when faced with the
dilemma of how to keep staff motivated without
spending more and more on incentive schemes.
When internal competitions are launched and
rewards are distributed there can be an
impressive improvement in employee performance
and morale. Yet once the initial excitement has
died down any enthusiasm built up in the
workforce can soon wear off.
Richard Denny, a descendant of Elizabethan
explorer Sir Walter Raleigh but probably more
famous in business circles for his speeches on
the subject of staff motivation, says there are
a number of rules companies should follow if
workers are to remain stimulated.
“Short-term incentive schemes are all very well
but employees will only stay interested if they
have a realistic goal and objective to strive
for. They must also enjoy their job, feel their
work is recognised and appreciated and see
evidence their employer is investing in their
future, this usually means being offered regular
training,” he says.
He claims the schemes awarding money as prizes
are often the least effective at generating
long-term motivation, while even tangible
rewards such as vouchers or bottles of wine can
fail to have the desired effect. “The best
solutions for keeping employees happy can cost
the business very little. Why not let someone
who has performed well to leave a couple of
hours early or, if they cannot be spared, give
them permission to use one of the directors’
parking spaces for a week? Recognising a
person’s performance in this way, or by giving
them a new job title, can be a more effective
motivator than money over the longer period and
will increase their loyalty to the company,” he
says.
Non-financial rewards can also be effective when
even the most motivated employee’s inspiration
begins to fade. For example, a normally happy
worker can become upset at having to work harder
than usual if the business is struggling or
perhaps vacancies in his or her department have
remained unfilled for weeks or maybe months.
The alternative way of rewarding people
suggested by Denny can also inspire those
cynical, long-serving members of staff who
regard any incentive scheme as yet another
fluffy initiative to come out of the marketing
department and something they have seen many
times before.
Graham Povey, managing director of Capital
Incentives & Motivation, says companies must
spend more time thinking about what he calls
‘motivational decline’ which is costing
businesses millions of pounds a year because
their greatest asset – their staff – is
under-performing.
“Businesses must invest in re-motivation and
pick up the momentum of their employees if it is
flagging. Sometimes the company profit share
scheme is just not enough,” he says.
The marketing department does have a
responsibility to try and revive excitement in
an incentive scheme if interest has begun to
wane. “The most successful schemes include
clever communications techniques that remind
participants of the rewards available. These
might involve the sending of clever teaser
emails which provide a taste of what can be won
if targets or goals are met, or the posting
around the office of regular updates of how
individuals are performing,” says Povey.
There are many reasons why a scheme can go flat.
The most common is a lack of imagination among
senior managers who recycle the same contest
mechanics year after year and then wonder why
employees fail to get excited. Other
explanations include resentment among staff who
are not asked for their input into what type of
scheme or rewards they would like, or perhaps
the prizes are issued so infrequently that
people simply cannot be bothered to take part.
Getting feedback before an incentive scheme is
launched can save company money and generate
better results.
The role of senior managers is vital to ensure
any initiative delivers on-going benefits. They
must be clear what a contest is trying to
achieve. For example, is the aim to generate an
immediate uplift in sales or is the idea to make
staff feel happier about where they work?
A scheme has more chance of achieving
long-lasting benefits if the workforce is fully
briefed and managers can answer questions raised
by staff and maybe their trade union. It is also
advisable to run a pilot scheme to test whether
an idea is suitable for a particular type of
business and the people working within it.
Once a scheme has been launched its on-going
effect on staff motivation must be monitored on
a regular basis so adjustments can be made if
there is evidence things are not going to plan.
Again, it is important to ask staff for their
comments to discover why some employees are
reluctant to get involved. Maybe the incentives,
such as membership of a golf club, discriminates
against some staff and this has created a bad
feeling within the company; or perhaps some
individuals feel their own chances of winning a
prize are too slim?...(full text:
www.marketing-week.co.uk) |
Marketing Week
February 24 2005 page 45
Fighting on the same side
Sainsbury’s new chief executive Justin King’s
acknowledgement that the supermarket must
improve its stock availability if it wants to be
great again certainly raised a smile among field
marketers.
The beleaguered grocer has fallen behind its
rivals Tesco and Asda in recent years partly,
admitted King, because customers are often
unable to complete their weekly shop. Brand
owners had been moaning about this for years but
in the past no-one at Sainsbury’s seemed to
listen.
King appears determined to iron out the problems
once and for all and has been joined on his
mission by new supply chain director Lawrence
Christensen, Safeway’s former group operations
director. Since King made his comments last
October field marketers report that their
relationship with local store managers and with
the merchandising and buying teams at
Sainsbury’s is improving.
“In the past perhaps Sainsbury’s did not fully
understand the importance of field marketing and
the mutual benefits it brings to the chain’s
stores as well as to the brands they sell,” says
CPM sales and marketing director Martin Ryan.
“Now we have more access to sales data and can
show individual Sainsbury’s managers which
outlets have stock problems with certain brands
and which categories in particular branches
could be performing better.”
In fact, the importance of ensuring consumers
can actually buy the products brands spend
millions of pounds promoting each year is one of
the fundamental reasons why client budgets for
third party in-store field marketing services
continue to grow.
Masterfoods recently commissioned CPM to develop
a bespoke ROI model which the brand owner is now
using to demonstrate to Sainsbury’s the
effectiveness of the in-store activity for its
various pet food and snack products such as
Whiskers and Twix.
It is 10 years since Tesco finally overtook
Sainsbury’s as Britain’s number one supermarket,
while Asda is now number two. Both companies are
praised by field marketers for the approach
their managers have to the discipline.
Asda’s preferred field marketing partner is CPM
and the chain’s managers are encouraged by head
office to run sampling days and host
demonstrations. Asda sees these as the perfect
way to encourage customers to try new products
and to give them the confidence to change their
buying habits.
“Four or five years ago the field marketing
activity we saw was very basic and there was a
lot less coordination, now we have a small army
of people coming into our stores,” says Dominic
Margetson, head of events at Asda. “We want our
managers to understand this is one of the
fastest-growing areas of marketing and, although
they are juggling so many other things, we need
their full support when working with brands and
their agencies so that everyone gains.”
Margetson produces a calendar of event days on
which managers must accommodate in-store
activity agreed by head office. There are also
store specific days where managers can choose to
run promotions. “Customers want a better
experience in store and we need to provide it.
Individual managers are shown results on how
well their stores perform when field work does
take place,” he says.
Arc Live has been the designated in-store
sampling and demonstrations provider for Tesco
for the past 12 years. This long-term
arrangement means Tesco managers recognise and
trust members of Arc’s local field teams, while
the grocer’s head office teams can rest assured
that the brand work taking place in its outlets
is structured and consistent.
“Whatever the merits of the work we are doing
the store manager is ultimately the king. We
have a strategy relationship with Tesco’s head
office but whether things happen at all
ultimately depends on how well we get on with
local managers,” says Tanya Sargent, managing
director of LIME, the field marketing division
of the Arc UK group. “Some managers will say no
because they feel their store is too small for a
particular demonstration while others are
desperate to be on the supplier’s wish-list of
targeted stores because they appreciate the
sales uplift that our work will bring.”
Arc’s appreciation of exactly what type of
promotional work Tesco does and does not want
taking place on its shop floor is one of the
main reasons it has enjoyed such a long
relationship with the retailer.
In fact, it is the field marketing agencies that
understand how the in-store systems and
procedures vary between different retailers who
are finding life easier within the multiples.
Knowledge is power in this game and by following
the rules to the letter brands are less likely
to irritate store managers…(full text:
www.marketing-week.co.uk) |
|
|
|
New Media Age Autumn 2005 –
Article on interactive installations as a growth
area for interactive agencies
One of the most
successful innovations at the Prada’s flagship
store in New York is an interactive changing
room featuring a magic mirror on one wall.
Product design
firm IDEO installed a camera which displays an
image of the occupant on the opposite wall. The
image is on a four second delay so the wearer
can spin around and view all sides of the
garment. Details of the piece of clothing,
including designer sketches, also appear on a
touch screen and the customer can search the
entire Prada catalogue.
It seems more and
more UK retailers want to create similar
relevant and engaging touch points for their
customers, and interactive agencies are set to
benefit. Stores such as Marks & Spencer,
Selfridges, Top Shop and O2 are already using
interactive installations.
Last Christmas M&S
commissioned agency de-construct to produce a
smart window installation at its Oxford Street
branch to promote its chargecard ‘&more’.
It used a
combination of interactive technology and an
audio application to create a live brand
experience triggered by passers by. Shoppers
were serenaded by the Dean Martin classic
‘That’s Amore’ and the window even interacted
with the colour of people’s clothing and their
movement past the shop via a tracking camera.
“This represented
a major change in mindset for a traditional
store like M&S and demonstrates how retail is
potentially a massive area for interactive
agencies wishing to develop this side of their
business,” says de-construct’s business
development director Dan Douglas.
Although
interactive installations have been popular in
the arts world for some time, the difficulty has
always been finding commercial applications for
the technology. Yet de-construct is not alone in
believing increased interest in these
applications from business will generate a
regular healthy revenue stream for agencies.
Founder of
interactive design studio thebigspace, Rob Le
Quesne, says the growth in the number of
interactive installations in retailers is all to
do with the trend towards ‘experience design’ on
the shop floor.
“Retailers need to
encourage consumers to actively participate in
their brand vision so they are offering
consumers an experience which immerses them in
the brand within a retail setting. It must
encourage the shopper to relax and distract them
so the brand values are re-enforced in ways that
are not necessarily linked directly to a
product, but more often to the overall brand
experience,” he says.
Of course, many
agencies have been considering the business
potential of interactive installations for some
time. When the directors at AllofUs worked
together at Digit they had an on-going R&D
project covering this market. “We were creating
our own installations in our own time because
this topic interested us so much, even if the
clients were not ready for it,” says business
and strategy director Phil Gerrard. “There has
been a big underground scene but the subject is
moving into the mainstream. This is a no-brainer
really because we are employing the networking
technology we already have to create a better
user experience.”
He agrees the
potential within retail is particularly
exciting. “Anything that can be produced on a
website can now be created in-store,” says
Gerrard. “But this is about more than just
slapping plasma screens everywhere. This is
about how interaction can be integrated into the
whole shopping experience and we are now working
with interior design companies when they are
fitting out stores.”
The automotive
sector is another industry predicted to lead the
demand for this type of work for agencies.
For example,
thebigspace was asked to design an interactive
installation to promote Fiat’s Lancia Ypsilon
model to a female audience at a Paris fashion
store where the car was being displayed.
The company used
fashion-inspired sound reactive animations which
appeared on a screen and responded to noise,
such as music, shouting or clapping. The user
was guided into a touch-screen finger-painting
experience where she could create a personalised
image of the car.
Pete Duggan,
creative director at design agency Glass, works
with British superbike team Rizla Suzuki and
agrees automotive clients want
commercially-viable ideas that will appeal to
consumers in a way traditional digital media
cannot.
“With Rizla Suzuki
we are targeting bike enthusiasts in their late
twenties and are considering leisure-type
installations, such as enabling people to race
motorbikes up escalators on the London
Underground,” says Duggan. “The challenge is to
devise things within a budget, but this is
possible because we are using existing
technology.”
Duggan says car
brands with dealerships could commission an
installation which lets the user interact with a
live show vehicle without the need for a
salesman. Using holopoint technology where users
simply point inside a frame to control
interactive content on any size screen, and a
projected 3D model, a person could rotate the
vehicle, click on hotspots for handbook and
style information, watch promotional adverts and
even book a test drive.
Another of Glass’s
clients is global advertising group McCann
Erickson which represents a number of automotive
brands. Its head of interactive, Clare Horbury,
is aware of the potential but still has some
reservations. “The concern for clients is that
the costs and benefits are still unproven
because this is still such an innovative area,”
she says.
Nevertheless,
interactive agencies are also winning new
business from traditional venues for these types
of applications, such as museums and galleries,
and from other public buildings.
For the Energy
exhibition at the Science Museum AllofUs
developed an interactive exhibit consisting of
three large wheels with images on their
circumference each containing radio frequency ID
(RFID) chips.
Children could
spin the wheel to locate objects which were
registered as the RFID chips passed by an LCD
touch screen in front of each wheel. The screen
produced a fun question and answer game to help
young users understand where energy comes from
and how to conserve it.
Curator Hanna
Redler says the museum needed to communicate to
seven-14 year olds who can find science boring.
“Our brief demanded interactive design, stunning
graphics and a creative idea. The interactive
element had to mean something as well as engage
the target audience,” she says.
Such is Hi-Res’
founder Florian Schmitt’s confidence in this
market that he has even formed a specialist
division called Nanika to develop interactive
installations for clients.
Nanika is working
with Top Shop in London to create magic mirrors
for its windows which will show how people would
look wearing different clothes. The agency is
also working on a secret project for a telecoms
brand which wants to experiment with new ways to
interact with its customers via screens, cameras
and voice controls.
It is not just
brand owners that are talking to agencies. Media
planners and buyers are also keen to work with
interactive companies to develop what is a
growing interest in this area among clients.
Posterscope, whose
core business is out of home advertising
planning and buying, has already seen how new
technology can have a massive impact on its
offer. Interactive posters that use Hypertag
technology and bus shelters with flat-screen TVs
and buttons to press enabling travellers to
watch film trailers are already in place. It now
wants to take things further.
“We are keen to
move from an interruption-based advertising
model to an engagement-based model facilitated
by technology and creativity,” says
Posterscope’s client services director Glen
Wilson. “There is a thirst among our clients to
have a deeper conversation with consumers out of
the home and interactive agencies are
well-placed to help them.”
As with any new
development there will always be challenges and
many clients are still put off taking a leap of
faith by the cost of these applications and
uncertainty over the return on investment they
can expect. They can also be nervous about the
actual installation element in case something
goes wrong. There is nothing worse for a brand’s
image than consumers looking at an installation
and having an error message flash back at them.
“We can only learn
from doing more of these types of installations
because there is no manual,” says Hi-Res’
Schmitt. “Few clients have experience in this
area so we can find ourselves talking to the
wrong person or department because no-one has
interactive installations within their sphere of
responsibility.”
Investment in
these products will rise substantially if
agencies can demonstrate a talent to move
interactivity away from screen-based media and
can show clients that large numbers of users
will engage with any application, whatever the
location. |
|
Campaign
magazine
–
September 16 2005
Universal Music
has been busy encouraging ad agencies to license
songs from Scottish band Texas’s forthcoming
album Red Book, but with little success.
Similarly, EMI
Music Publishing is mystified why it has failed
to secure any interest for artist James Blunt’s
music to be used in commercials despite the
singer topping the singles and album charts this
summer.
The fact these two
music industry giants still find it so hard to
match artists with the exact needs of the
advertising community says a lot about the
relationship between these two creative and
passionate businesses.
It is a
partnership which has traditionally been
strained and full of suspicion. Record companies
and music publishers accuse agencies of leaving
the choice of songs to the last minute and not
appreciating the value of music. They also
slate client briefs for being too confusing and
contradictory and say agencies expect global and
all-media rights for a track but will rarely
spend more than 2.5 percent of the production
budget on music.
In the other
corner the music business is criticised for
taking too long to clear rights and not
indemnifying an agency if clearance fails to
materialise after weeks of waiting. Agencies
also complain they are being charged too much
considering the promotional window such TV
exposure provides for established and new acts.
Agencies are also
distrustful of the record labels’ own marketing
agenda, accusing them of pushing bands who have
new singles or albums due out rather than
offering tracks that meet the agency’s brief.
Texas’s album is out on October 31 by the way.
“We are two very
different industries and want the other to work
how we work and that is never going to happen,”
says Tracie London-Rowell, Universal Music UK’s
director of film and TV advertising. “The music
business is perceived as being full of
money-grabbing bastards, but the market is
changing and at Universal we understand we need
to be more flexible.”
On the subject of
Texas she points out that rather than being wary
of attempts to push songs from a new album ad
agencies should be more open minded. She urges
creative teams to see the cost and brand
association benefits of licensing tracks from an
established band before the songs become hits
and licensing fees rise.
EMI Music
Publishing managing director Guy Moot accepts
his company will push certain songs but he is
frustrated that few ad executives really
appreciate the importance of music to a creative
campaign. “Many advertising people do not get a
warm feeling about music because they see too
many obstacles. We want to work with agencies to
exploit different marketing opportunities,
especially across new digital platforms,” he
says. “We also have a strong team of song
writers who could be writing more exclusive
songs for ads.”
The music industry
may be offering an olive branch but the agencies
remain wary. They claim this is happening only
because the record business is suffering from
falling singles sales and internet piracy which
is hitting revenue.
BBH, which formed
its in-house music publishing arm Leap Music in
a joint venture with former Zomba Music
Publishers executive Richard Kirstein in 2003,
says the pressure record companies are under
means agencies can negotiate better value
synchronisation deals.
The creation of
Leap did nothing to smooth over the cracks
between the two industries. Record executives
accused BBH and Kirstein of creating an
unwelcome divide and invading their territory.
Head of TV
production at BBH, Frances Royle, is unrepentant
and says Kirstein’s experience has speeded up
the licensing process because he knows exactly
who to speak to and whether a fee is fair.
Indeed, Kirstein’s knowledge of the music
industry is probably unrivalled in ad land.
How much an agency
should pay for a song is a complex calculation
and depends on an act’s chart pedigree and
profile as well as how enthusiastic they are to
be linked with a product. “We can certainly push
for better deals but we may still have to use
different tracks for different countries if the
cost of a multi-territory licence is too high,”
says Kirstein.
JWT’s head of TV
admin, Tim Millin, is more sympathetic to the
record business and accepts music should be
introduced into the creative process earlier. He
also understands why rights owners are annoyed
when agencies try to negotiate on a piecemeal
basis by adding extra territories months after
an initial deal has been agreed.
“If you talk to
the rights owner in plenty of time and put your
cards on the table and say this is your budget
most music companies can be flexible,” says
Millin.
The negotiation
and cost of rights is at the root of the
distrust in this market which is fuelled by the
on-going debate of who needs who more. A strong
song can make or break a commercial but an ad is
a valuable promotional tool for any record
company.
Contracts are also
more complicated these days because agencies
will want all media rights across many
territories and, with singles sales declining,
are starting to negotiate a royalty rate for any
album sales generated on the back of a licensed
track.
This has been
prompted by the trend for record companies to
exploit interest in a song by putting it on an
album. Examples include Velvet Underground’s I’m
Sticking With You used in a Hyundai commercial.
It was not originally on the greatest hits
package but the album was quickly re-issued
containing the song. More recently Norman Cooke
wrote a track for O2 which was added to the Fat
Boy Slim album Palookaville, boosting sales this
year for Skint Records.
Ultimately the
choice of music for an ad will ultimately depend
on the emotion the creative team wants to
generate rather than whether a song can produce
any incremental income for the agency or brand.
With this in mind
it is hard to point to any commercial where the
music selection was actually wrong because this
is so difficult to measure. There are things
agencies should avoid, however, such as using
tracks with lyrics which clash with the ad’s
narrative, or choosing music which is considered
too bland for the product being advertised. It
is understood this was one of the reasons EMI
Music Publishing has had trouble licensing James
Blunt’s hit single You’re Beautiful.
Record companies
often criticise agencies for not testing the
music they select. Entertainment Media Research
founder Peter Ruppert wants to work with
agencies who he says should base their decisions
on more than gut-instinct. “They should be
asking themselves if the brand values of the
artist fits the image and qualities of the
product their client is trying to promote,” he
says.
One way to avoid
having to make the often exasperating round of
telephone calls to discover who owns the rights
to a song is to use a music consultancy.
“With so many
misconceptions about both industries the
solution is for both sides to play to their
strengths and recognise synch licensing is
ultimately a small piece of their respective
businesses,” says Richard Corbett, director of
music consultancy Ricall. “Record companies and
publishers do not have the core competencies to
develop creative hooks for brands in the same
way ad agencies have no expertise developing
music and selling it.”
Despite the
reluctance of some agencies to go with unproven
tracks many will adopt unsigned or newly-signed
acts in commercials for creative as well as
obvious cost reasons. “Agencies are more open to
using up and coming artists because they realise
the association an act could bring to a brand
over the long-term,” says Barbara Zamoyska, head
of film, TV and advertising at Universal Music
Publishing.
BBH’s Leap Music
has begun purchasing material from unsigned
bands. Earlier this year it sourced the song
Finding Your Feet from unknown act The Aches on
behalf of agency Mustoes for an HP Sauce
Official commercial.
Although there are
tensions between these very different but
equally creative businesses, there is evidence
both industries want to collaborate more.
EMI Music
Publishing and Abbott Mead Vickers worked
together to produce this summer’s commercial for
BT Broadband’s i-tunes promotion. Four of the
five tracks were from EMI, including A-list
songs by Blur and Supergrass.
“Rather than
having the first discussion about the music in
the final few days of post production we were
sending over music to the producer and getting
feedback at script stage and during the shoot.
This has to be the way forward,” says EMI’s
director of commercial markets Adrienne Dunlop.
The IPA and the
Music Publishers Association (MPA) operate a
liaison group and have produced a joint document
which includes all the questions agencies might
have regarding licensing music. The MPA has also
published notes to explain why it can take time
to get rights cleared. An artist could be on
tour or a deal may have to be cleared by
executives in the US, for example.
The group last met
in August to agree the terms of a standard music
synchronisation document which could reduce
agency lawyers’ fees.
Just how many
promotional CDs MPA members left on the table
during this particular gathering for agency
representatives to pick up is unclear, but you
can’t blame them for trying. |
|
|
PR
Week November 5 2004 Page 29
Impress the press
At the Labour Party’s former press centre on the
ground floor of Millbank Tower in July the
British Olympic Association unveiled Britain’s
team for Athens.
Athletes such as Kelly Holmes, Steve Backley and
Phillip Idowu were at the press conference which
was broadcast live on BBC News and Sky News and
attended by more than 50 journalists eager to
get to speak to some of the nation’s sporting
heroes before they left for Greece.
The event was organised by Lewis PR which has a
10-year lease on the refurbished media centre at
Millbank, with its 200-seat auditorium,
broadcast media links for BBC, ITN and Sky
newsrooms as well as impressive translation
facilities.
The venue is likely to be used again by
representatives of London 2012 in the next few
weeks when the organisation is ready to disclose
more details of the bid to bring the Olympic
Games to Britain for the first time since 1948.
Of course, not all organisations have such a
high profile as the Olympic Games or can use
such impressive venues to entice busy
journalists to their events.
In a modern media age where editorial teams are
stretched and news is available 24 hours a day
via the internet, companies increasingly need
PROs to advise them on how to get editors to
leave their desks.
Press conferences remain a useful tool in a
PRO’s armoury but they are no longer the weapon
of mass destruction they once were. Tony
Bradley, national vice president at the IPR and
a partner at Bradley O’Mahoney Public Relations
in Newcastle, says journalists’ needs have
changed and events must reflect this.
“For generations the press conference in a
swanky hotel followed by lunch was an efficient
way of ensuring good media coverage but things
are different now,” he says. “Unless there is a
regulatory or legal reason why nothing can be
said outside of a set time and venue – and the
media knows this is the case – it is easier to
accept that everyone is looking for their own
angle on a story and to work with them to meet
their aspirations and their deadlines.”
Bradley cites the example of a press conference
he organised in September for Teeside Airport
which was being renamed Durham Tees Valley
Airport. It was a contentious subject and local
journalists were demanding exclusives. Although
nothing was said on the record before the
conference Bradley allowed the morning paper to
run with a factually accurate preview piece,
while the evening paper had the new logo and an
artist’s impression of the new terminal
building. The press event itself included a
chartered flight around the area to encourage
journalists to attend even though the story was
broken in the morning before the official press
conference.
Editors are inundated with invitations so any
event must be planned meticulously. This means
choosing a convenient date, time and venue and
ensuring the client’s spokespeople can talk
authoritatively about their subject and answer
questions confidently.
Increasingly PROs must be more innovative to woo
journalists, such as choosing an unusual venue
or ensuring invitations are creative enough to
stand out from the rest of an editor’s morning
post.
Cookware company Meyer Prestige always hosts
press conferences to unveil new products and
marketing manager Alison Senior tells her PR
agency EHPR to be imaginative when selling
events to the media. To promote its Anolon
professional cookware range it hired Raymond
Blanc’s cookery school and restaurant Le Manoir
so journalists could witness the famous chef
using the products.
“There must be a good reason for a journalist to
be there so we usually have a product
demonstration or offer exclusive interviews. It
is important writers, especially those working
for the home press, get the products in their
hands so it inspires them,” says Senior.
“Meeting a journalist face to face also means
our PROs understand the type of information he
or she needs so we can target them better.”
Whenever you talk to journalists about press
conferences there are some common complaints
that arise. They get very annoyed when the story
they were promised turns out to be much weaker
in reality, and they become irritated if an
event clashes with another conference or a
magazine’s editorial deadlines.
The contents of the traditional press pack can
also get on their nerves. Editors want copies of
a presentation, a press release and other
relevant information including photography.
Promotional gimmicks such as branded mouse mats,
pens, note books and mugs they can live without,
they claim.
“My advice would be to ensure there is always a
good story and never to spin out an event over a
day or weekend for no reason. A couple of hours
should be enough,” says Julian Hunt, editor of
William Reed weekly The Grocer. “PROs must
understand and be sensitive to the competitive
rivalries that exist between different magazines
when giving exclusives. We also need as much
notice as possible. If Tesco calls me to say it
is announcing a merger tomorrow I will be there,
if a food manufacturer is opening a new factory
I would expect to be told a few weeks in
advance.”
Of course, for national and international news
stories press conferences are often hastily
arranged.
Porter Novelli’s head of media relations, Ben
McCarthy, had 15 years working as a broadcast
journalist for BBC, ITN and Sky News. He
attended numerous high profile press conferences
including those arranged during the Soham
murders investigation. He says when a big story
breaks a conference is the ideal vehicle to
reach all the media at once while the people
involved can control the flow of information.
“Journalists will attend at short notice if the
story is important enough, and questions from
the media can provide new leads for the police
and help prompt responses from the public,” he
says. “The press conference can add to the drama
of a story if people see the cameras, so it can
be disappointing for broadcasters if they turn
up and hardly anyone is there.”
It is important to get feedback from journalists
so they will attend future press conferences.
Ask them how an event could have been better and
if they spoke to the people they needed to.
Basically, did they get the story angles they
were looking for?... (full text: www.prweek.com)
|
PR WEEK:
Litigation PR: I won't see you in court
Published on May 20 2005
As lawyers urge more of their clients to settle
out of court, litigation PR must change with the
times, says Steve Hemsley.
Immediately after Martin Bashir's high-profile
documentary Living With Michael Jackson was
broadcast on ITV in 2003, litigation PR
specialist Bell Yard set to work for the singer,
devising a rebuttal strategy to respond to
hostile media coverage.
Working closely with Jackson's legal teams in
the UK and the US, Bell Yard focused media
attention on the betrayal Jackson felt he had
suffered at the hands of Bashir. It prompted a
full front-page story in the Evening Standard.
It is an ongoing contract for Bell Yard as
Jackson continues his claim for damages from
Granada Media Group, although activity has been
halted because of the performer's child-abuse
trial in the US.
Jackson's legal teams understand how an
effective litigation PR campaign can win over
those inside and outside of the courtroom. PROs
involved in this specialist area have a close
relationship with lawyers as well as
journalists. Yet the role of the trad itional
litigation PRO is changing.
Increasingly, parties involved in disputes,
whether they are celebrities or corporations,
are choosing alternative methods of resolution,
such as arbitration, mediation and adjudication.
This trend started in 1999, following one of the
biggest changes to the civil justice system,
when the Access to Justice reforms came into
play. These measures were intended to lessen the
burden on courts by encouraging people to
resolve their grievances by alternative and more
cost-effective methods than a court hearing.
The reforms appear to have worked. According to
the Department for Constitutional Affairs, the
number of claims heard by the High Court's
Chancery Division, which deals with disputes
relating to intellectual property, patents and
trademarks, fell from 8,720 in 1998-99 to 6,335
in 2002-03. Similarly, the number of claims
heard by the Queen's Bench Division, which
assesses damages claims for breach of contract
and libel, were d own from 72,161 to 14,191 over
the same period.
Lawyers are increasingly advising corporate
clients to avoid court because even if a company
wins its case, it can take years for a brand's
image to recover from negative media coverage.
Lawyers are even encouraging the use of
arbitration clauses in business contracts to
pre-empt future disputes.
For journalists, the reforms were bad news
because, unlike in the High Court where juicy
details are made public, discussions during
arbitration are confidential. There is also
argument over whether the workload for PROs will
also suffer from this growth in non-litigation
resolution.
'Many lawyers are pushing their clients into
legally binding third-party arbitration, and if
more people choose this cheaper and less public
course of action they will have less of a need
for litigation PROs,' says Stephen Lock, general
manager at Mmd Public Relations (Russia).
Lock has worked on a number of high-profile
intellectual pro perty actions, such as the
'grey market' battles of Nike versus Sainsbury's
and Tommy Hilfiger versus Tesco. 'Often
litigation PR relies on an exclusive being given
to the Sunday papers and usable quotes being
given to titles that cannot afford to have
journalists in court all day. We will see less
and less of this,' he argues.
While many PROs accept the number of court cases
requiring their services will continue to
decline, there is debate about how far levels of
business will fall. Many insist there will
always be demand for their services as disputes
must be settled one way or another.
'While the current trend is bad news for the
media, which won't get as much colourful copy
from the courts, it is good for PR because it
means clients will not be washing their dirty
linen in front of judges,' says Partner PR
director Jonathan Hawker.
'But clients will still need PROs who understand
the legal process and appreciate the impact a
dispute can have on reputation ,' he adds.
Indeed, for clients that do face the prospect of
a lengthy and costly court battle, PR can be a
useful weapon to convince the instigators of
legal action to resolve things differently.
'There can be tremendous pressure surrounding a
legal action in terms of the impact it can have
on the standing of a company or person. Good
litigation PR and the media coverage it
generates can govern whether people settle,
arbitrate or mediate. A lot of our work goes on
before a case begins,' says Weber Shandwick
Legal managing director Jon McLeod. He worked
with lawyers representing Hollywood couple
Catherine Zeta Jones and Michael Douglas during
their much-publicised court battle with Hello!.
However, he believes that in the future,
celebrities will be more inclined to settle out
of court, particularly when it comes to libel
cases.
Full story:
http://www.prweekuk.com/thisweek/index.cfm?ID=238236&site=1
|
|
|
MUSIC WEEK May
14 2005
If big is beautiful then the music industry
should find the £711m broadcasting giant created
today by the merger of Capital Radio and GWR
extremely attractive.
Known as GCap Media, the new super-size group
reaches 17.1m listeners a week, according to the
latest Rajar figures. It encompasses strong
radio brands such as Classic FM and 95.8 Capital
FM as well as the Century Radio and The Mix
local networks, 104.9 Xfm and a host of digital
stations.
Capital FM managing director Keith Pringle says
the size of the deal means the new company can
compete head-on with Radio One and Radio Two
when it comes to supporting live music and
promoting new and established artists to a
national audience.
“We are inviting record companies to get around
the table with us over the next few months and
to think innovatively about how we can work
together to push albums and launch and re-launch
careers. Many artists appeal to listeners of
virtually all our brands so we can make a huge
smash across the country with one message,” says
Pringle.
Yet there is work for the new group to do. The
Rajars reveal that 95.8 Capital FM’s audience
fell from 2.3m to 2.1m in 12 months, while 104.9
Xfm’s reach slipped from 559,000 to 517,000.
Classic FM, meanwhile, fell disappointingly
under the 6.0m mark and has lost more than half
a million listeners in a year.
The merger comes at a time when the BBC has
stretched its market share lead over the
commercial sector to more than 10%, at 54.2%
compared with 43.8%.
This fact meant the independent companies were
not in a party mood for what was actually the
50th Rajar press conference. It even prompted
Emap’s head of radio Mark Storey to remark that
all commercial groups must learn from the
Capital and GWR deal and work closer together to
attract and keep young listeners. He cites the
success of UK Radio Aid in January which
involved 200 stations as a perfect example of
how the industry can collaborate effectively.
The commercial sector may even be going through
something of an identity and image crisis
because 14 stations have changed their name
since the last Rajar.
The latest figures for the BBC brought
particularly good news for the national music
stations as Radio One and Radio Two both
increased their reach and share compared with
this time last year.
Radio One now has 9.9m (2004: 9.8m) adult
listeners while its share has risen from 7.6% to
8.4%. Chris Moyles has added 250,000 listeners
in 12 months at breakfast and is now heard by
around 7.0m adults a week.
One notable result for Radio One which
illustrates the pressures on commercial stations
at the moment is that the network reached more
people in London, almost 1.4m, than Kiss 100
(1.29m) during the three months. It is the first
time this has happened since 2001.
“That particular result demonstrates what we are
offering appeals to a wider international young
audience in London. Our huge web presence is
also raising awareness of our music and
programming,” says controller Andy Parfitt who
is busy preparing for Radio One’s traditionally
hectic summer. The station is committed to 25
large-scale events in the UK and internationally
and its live music schedule always boosts its
second and third quarter Rajar performances.
Radio Two saw its audience rise to 13.3m (12.9m)
and it achieved another record share of 16.5%.
“We started to get the music policy right a
couple of years ago and now have the balance
correct between new music and established
artists. When people listen to us they know our
presenters believe in what they are playing and
that really matters,” says Radio Two controller
Lesley Douglas.
The national commercial stations saw their
overall audience fall slightly but their share
rose from 9.9% to 10.2%, helped by their digital
services. Among the digital stations to post a
strong rise in audience was Planet Rock, part of
the new GCap Media group, which now has 286,000
listeners, up 18% in 12 months.
The rise in interest in digital radio also
benefited the BBC. BBC 6 Music saw its audience
grow from 187,000 a week a year ago to 311,000,
while 1Xtra’s reach was up from 263,000 to
351,000. Steve Lamacq began presenting five days
a week on 6 Music at the beginning of April.
Head of programmes at 6 Music, Ric Blaxill, says
the figures are an endorsement of the station’s
approach to music radio. “This is a crowded
market but we have a strong playlist. We
champion new music and mix that with core
artists while allowing our respected presenters
free choice in their shows,” he says…. (full
text www.musicweek.com) |
|
|
EVENT Magazine
London faces stiff competition in its bid to
host the 2012 Olympics. Steve Hemsley assesses
the French proposal.
A giant water wall-clock has been erected in the
old French port of La Rochelle, counting down
the days to the International Olympic
Committee’s (IOC) final decision as to which
city will host the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic
Games.
Water will cascade between the two ancient
towers at the entrance to the port until 6 July,
when the French hope to celebrate with something
much stronger. Indeed, if Paris beats New York,
Madrid, Moscow and, of course, London to the
biggest prize in the global sporting calendar,
you can expect plenty of champagne to be flowing
throughout the country.
Around 85% of the population support the bid and
Paris has been considered a frontrunner. The
city’s transport and venue infrastructure is
certainly impressive, having successfully staged
the Fifa World Cup in 1998 and the World
Athletics Championships in August 2003.
The head of the 13-strong IOC evaluation
committee, former Moroccan 400-metre hurdles
gold medallist Nawal El Moutawakel, could not
help mentioning the quality of the Paris dossier
before she left France at the end of the IOC’s
four-day inspection visit in March.
She also dismissed suggestions by
mischief-making rivals that the general strike
to defend France’s 35-hour week, which
unfortunately took place during the visit, was a
threat to the city’s chances.
Despite Paris’ position as a 2/5 hot favourite
with some bookmakers, the bid team is taking
nothing for granted before July’s full IOC
meeting in Singapore. Paris hosted the Games in
1900 and 1924, but its failed bids for the 1992
and the 2008 Games still hurt. It was therefore
a somewhat nervy French sports minister,
Jean-François Lamour – a former Olympic fencing
champion – and city mayor Bertrand Delanoe who
met El Moutawakel and her colleagues at Charles
de Gaulle airport on 8 March.
Remaining neutral
The delegation was met by thousands of online
skaters cruising down the Champs-Elysées wearing
Paris 2012 T-shirts. However, the IOC will never
be swayed by pomp and ceremony or enthusiastic
crowds, and much of its visit was spent behind
closed doors analysing the Paris Bid Book,
submitted last November.
One reason why the city’s position is so strong
is because it will not require a massive
building programme that would cost the country
many billions of euros. The total budget for a
2012 Games in Paris is an estimated €4.1bn
(£2.8bn), of which €2.2bn (£1.5bn) would come
from ticket sales, merchandise and sponsorship.
The remainder would be shared between private
business, Paris local government, the regions
and national funding.
The French business community is getting behind
the bid through the Paris 2012 Corporate Club,
which has 17 major international French company
members including Accenture, Airbus, Air France,
France Télécom, Publicis and Renault. This level
of support illustrates how the corporate sector
views the economic and social opportunities for
Paris and the whole of France. Research by the
Boston Consulting Group suggests 42,000 new jobs
and €35bn (£28.8bn) of additional revenue would
be generated across France by a Paris Games.
“In the past ten years Paris has organised 26
world championships across different sports,
from football to table tennis. Our slogan is
‘L’Amour des Jeux’ or ‘Love of the Games’ and
that extends to a love of organising games,”
says deputy CEO of the Paris 2012 bid team Essar
Gabriel, who worked with the Australian
organising committee on the 2000 Games.
Nevertheless, the IOC has to be convinced that
Paris can host something on such a massive scale
as a modern-day Olympic Games, and the
delegation insisted on visiting existing venues
along with the site of proposed developments.
The Paris concept is ‘One Village, Two Clusters’
and the IOC travelled by bus between the north
and the west of the capital. The bid team is
adamant only a small number of new venues will
be needed, which will avoid the problem of any
stadiums becoming white elephants once the Games
has finished.
The two most conspicuous permanent new builds
would be the 20,000-capacity Aquatic Centre in
the northern cluster at Aubervilliers for the
swimming events, and a 22,000-seater Superdome
five kilometres from the Olympic village for
gymnastics and various Paralympic sports.
First stop for the IOC was a disused railway
yard in a 111-acre area of the Batignolles
district of north west Paris, where the Olympic
village will be built. This will be within a
ten-minute drive of 18 of the 30 proposed
venues.
The delegation was then driven to the impressive
Stade de France, which is also in the northern
cluster. This 80,000-capacity stadium hosted the
1998 World Cup final and would be the flagship
venue for the 2012 Games. It has been renamed
Stade de France Paris 2012 to support the bid,
and would be used for the opening and closing
ceremonies, track and field events and football.
After taking lunch with French sportsmen and
women, the IOC travelled to the western cluster.
The committee visited venues such as the
14,000-capacity Roland-Garros stadium and the
Croix Catelan – site of the Olympic Games in
1900 – which will take the form of an additional
temporary 3,000-seat venue to host the modern
pentathlon.
Last stop was the Eiffel Tower, where from the
second floor the inspectors could overlook the
northern and western clusters. Beach volleyball
would take place beneath the tower.
The third day of the tour included presentations
from leading politicians on subjects such as
anti-doping and security. The itinerary included
a working lunch with Prime Minister Jean-Pierre
Raffarin and the country’s transport, finance
and foreign affairs ministers. In the evening,
the IOC committee descended on the Elysée Palace
for dinner with President Jacques Chirac.
Knock-on effect
Should Paris manage to convince the IOC, the
opportunities for the corporate event,
hospitality and exhibition market from an
Olympic Games will be huge. Gabriel notes that
as the Games will take place in August, many
venues and event organisers can only gain from
such an occasion. “Look at how venues in
Barcelona and Sydney exploited the Games before,
during and after the event. It is up to the
professional convention centres in France to
leverage something like this and put together
attractive offers for business,” he says.
Full story:
http://www.eventmagazine.co.uk/features/Features_story.cfm?ID=4098
|
|
|
|
The Grocer. Summer
2004 – Ireland Supplement
Nigeria’s answer
to James Bond is more likely to down a glass of
Guinness than a dry Martini.
Adventure
character Michael Powers drinks Guinness in the
hit African movie Critical Assignment, and such
brand endorsement has done sales of Guinness
Foreign Extra Stout and Malta Guinness no harm
at all in the region.
Guinness is
arguably Ireland’s most famous global brand
although most drinkers in Africa are probably
unaware of the brand’s Irish heritage because it
has been brewed in Nigeria since 1963. In fact,
Diageo sells more Guinness in Africa than in
Ireland. Sales in Nigeria were up 15% in the
last half year while they fell by 7% in the
Emerald Isle.
Nevertheless, like
most of Ireland’s largest food and drink
producers, Guinness will exploit its Irishness
whenever it can when it comes to branding. The
level of marketing activity linked to St
Patrick’s Day celebrations around the world is
testament to that. While from a business
perspective it made commercial and branding
sense to shut the Park Royal brewing arm in
London earlier this year and concentrate
production for the British and Irish markets at
its historic Dublin brewery.
“If you wanted to
launch a beer brand today you would not invent a
dark, strong bitter, so the continued global
success of Guinness emphasises that the strength
of the brand is often more important than where
it comes from. It stands for different things in
different countries. In Africa it is seen as a
fertility aid, while in Britain it demonstrates
a drinker’s individuality and ability to stand
out from the crowd,” says global brand director
Jon Potter.
Guinness is not
Diageo’s only global Irish brand, of course.
Baileys accounts for more than half of all
spirits exported from Ireland and represents 6%
of all Irish food and drink exports. When the
brand was launched in 1974, 8,000 cases a day
were produced. That figure is now almost 47,000.
The company has re-branded Baileys and a global
marketing campaign this year will attempt to
drive global sales up from 79.2m bottles a year
to 120m by 2007.
For most sectors
of the Irish food and drink industry it is an
important part of any sales strategy to shout
about a product’s Irish heritage. Ireland’s
year-round mild weather caused by the Gulf
Stream often gets a mention, particularly in the
dairy trade. It allows the cows to graze on
grass for up to 11 months of the year and this
has created the most natural milk production
system in Europe.
Glanbia is one of
Ireland’s real business success stories. Quoted
on the London and Dublin stockmarkets and with a
market capitalisation of £480.1m, it is
challenging the world’s biggest cheese
manufacturers and suppliers of dairy-based
nutritional ingredients. The group also includes
Glanbia Foods, the second largest integrated
cheese producer in the UK.
Much of its recent
success can be traced back to the new corporate
identity it adopted in 1997 when the Avonmore
and Waterford dairies merged to create Europe’s
fourth largest dairy. It needed to re-brand
itself if it was to appeal to a global market
and successfully introduce added-value products.
Branding
consultancy Corporate Edge devised the name
Glanbia, which means ‘pure food’ in Gaelic. It
also proposed a fundamental repositioning of the
company as a market-focused, international food
company, rather than as an Irish manufacturer of
dairy products.
Full text:
www.grocer.co.uk |
|
|
|
The Grocer-
January 2005. Store Manager Recruitment
Sir Clive
Woodward’s desire to test his skills in the
world of soccer after guiding the England rugby
team to World Cup glory will strike a cord with
some of the country’s most talented retail
managers.
Woodward is
convinced the technical and coaching practices
he employed with the oval ball could be adapted
and applied to the round ball game. He is
probably right. And, like many store managers
working across various retail sectors, he does
not want to be pigeon-holed and the assumption
made that his talents cannot be adapted to a
different -but similar - role.
You do not have to
spend too long talking to experts in recruitment
and human resources to discover grocers have
suffered in the past from a closed-mind attitude
when it comes to utilising the skill-sets of
senior store managers from other retailers. Yet
as the supermarkets’ share of non-food sales has
soared they have been forced to cast their
recruitment net much wider to find talented
managers of the future.
Of course,
recruiting store managers from non-grocery
backgrounds has meant a steep learning curve for
everyone. The different volumes involved between
food and non-food categories, the speed at which
some lines leave the shelves and the logistics
of sourcing, storing and supplying many items,
such as electronics, can require a significant
amount of hand-holding for managers in the early
months.
Unfortunately the
supermarkets are discovering the talent pool is
not as deep as they would like it to be. There
are still concerns over whether someone who has
run an out of town electrical multiple could
handle the fast-moving and price-sensitive world
of food, while the differences in the retail and
employee cultures between working for a
department store compared to a grocer can be too
difficult for some senior people to overcome.
“In reality there
is only a small group of people who can cope
with the modern day supermarket store profile,
so the grocers need recruits with experience in
non-food who can implement best practice in
these new areas as quickly as possible,” says
James Bass, manager of Retail Professionals, a
division of recruitment, retention and
development consultancy PRO.
He adds: “The
modern grocery format needs this external
expertise in its management team to get to the
next level and the struggle to find the people
they need is fuelling a new talent war between
retailers from all sectors as every company
wants to hold on to its best people.”
The supermarkets
not only want people with a depth of knowledge
of non-food but increasingly need the executives
they recruit to be effective business managers
at store level. This means candidates for any
senior post must be able to demonstrate they can
oversee a team of specialist category managers
employed beneath them, and who themselves may
have been recruited from various backgrounds.
“The grocers must
keep a complete open mind about where the next
generation of managers will come from. It is no
longer the case that a Sainsbury’s manager will
move to Tesco and vice-versa. The clever
employers are looking at recruiting from
companies in the leisure sector such as
Whitbread or Costa Coffee, or from call centres.
Basically, from anywhere where senior people are
skilled in customer service and in winning
repeat business,” says Simon Hayton a
co-director at Imagine Recruitment.
The fiercely
competitive nature of this end of the business
is expected to drive up salaries by as much as
10% during 2005, although grocery chains may be
able to resist any large-scale clamour for more
money from their managers because of the
strength of the various supermarket brands and
their reputation as good employers.
Although the
supermarkets have to search hard for people with
the complementary skill-sets they need there is
no shortage of applications for store manager
posts when they arise. Managers of large format
retailers such as Matalan, Gap or Ikea can reach
a crossroads in their careers when looking for
their next step up and feel the need to look to
grocery to progress professionally. These store
groups, plus others such as Woolworths and
Debenhams, are predicted to provide an
increasing number of grocery managers over the
next few years.
Full Text:
www.grocer.co.uk |
|
|
|
Builders
Merchants Journal September 2004 |
|
Garden Landscaping
|
| |
|
The dreary weather
system which hovered above England and Wales on
June 23 was the deepest depression for that
month ever recorded by the Met Office since it
began measuring such things back in 1854. |
|
As fascinating as
this piece of trivia might be to the many
Britons obsessed with the weather, it will not
impress anyone involved in the selling of garden
landscaping products. |
|
Above average
rainfall across the country in May, June and
early July (source: Met Office) kept consumers
indoors. Another type of depression, this time
associated with England’s disappointing
performance at Euro 2004, added to the nation’s
gloom at the start of the summer and distracted
people when they should have been spending money
enjoying their gardens. |
|
It means merchants
and suppliers have had to work hard to ensure
what is a seasonal business at the best of times
has not been a complete wash-out. |
|
The warm weather
at the end of July came as a big relief to
everyone, but Marshalls’ marketing director,
Chris Harrop, believes it is more of a case that
sales were simply put off for a few weeks or
months rather than lost altogether. “In May and
June we looked at the order books for installers
and they were busy. The early summer wet weather
meant a lot of the work was delayed, but many
projects are being commissioned by time-poor,
cash-rich consumers who are not DIYers but want
the jobs done for them to achieve a look they
crave. They are prepared to wait,” he says. |
|
Of course,
suppliers and merchants involved in garden
landscaping have not only been peering out of
their office windows to see if the rain has
stopped. They have also been looking for signs
that consumer-spending is slowing down. Recent
jumps in interest rates are designed to make
consumers think twice about adding to their debt
burden and, however nice it looks, installing a
new driveway, paving or decking remains a luxury
purchase for many. |
|
Harrop admits
there are signs the private housing RMI sector
is slowing. “Marshalls tracks this market more
closely than anyone. We expect 2% growth this
year with sales static next year. Yet, if we do
things right, we have the skills to create a
strong market whether people are moving house or
staying put,” he says. |
|
If there is
pent-up demand ready to be converted into hard
sales during the autumn then installers will be
extremely busy. A local landscaper can only work
on a limited number of gardens each week because
of fading daylight so it is essential the
merchant he or she visits sells as much
added-value products as possible per branch
visit. |
|
Harrop says this
should not be too difficult. Studies by
Marshalls reveal that around 75% of consumers it
questioned said they want quality products and
are not simply looking for cheap solutions. The
company provides a design service, installation
guides and helps consumers to colour-match
paving and walling products so they blend in
with the architectural design of a house. |
|
Brett
Landscaping’s marketing director, Mike Woodcock,
reports that by July some merchants were
reporting sales down by around 30% compared with
last year because of the poor weather. He
believes the best the industry can hope for now
is to see sales in the second half of the season
match last year’s levels. |
|
In reality, Brett
already has its sights set on 2005 and beyond
having invested a significant sum in a new
concrete paving plant at Barrow-Upon-Soar in
Leicestershire. It was officially opened in May
at a launch party attended by more than 80
merchants and contractors. |
|
“The weather this
year has come as a shock to everyone after the
hot summer of 2003, but over the longer term we
see continued growth of around 5% per annum in
concrete paving. Landscaping is still
media-driven and we will continue to work with
merchants to help them get their displays right
so it is easier for them to sell up,” says Mr
Woodcock. |
|
As BMJ went
to press, Brett had still to unveil the
additions to its range for 2005, but during
September merchants should receive a revamped
product guide featuring the new products. This
publication follows a new-look Atlas Stone
brochure published in March which provided
merchants, installers and consumers with design
ideas using classic paving, natural stone,
aggregates and rocks. Brett has also given its
website an overhaul, again to provide installers
and homeowners with design ideas and advice. |
|
Brett is not alone
in investing in new plant in anticipation that
the garden landscaping market will continue to
expand. |
|
Plasmor has spent £5.5m on a
2,275sq m factory at Boughton to develop its
Plaspave brand throughout Nottinghamshire,
Lincolnshire, Derbyshire, Leicestershire and
Warwickshire. This is the company’s eighth
production site and sales director, John Swain,
says merchants are already benefiting from the
increased capacity…(Extract
only) |
| |
|
Builders Merchants
Journal October 2004 |
|
Employees buy into
business branding |
| |
|
If you ever have
time to ask your employees to write down what
your merchant business stands for and how it
differs from its competitors most of them will
probably just stare at you blankly.
|
|
It is all very
well talking about customer service and value
for money in external advertising and marketing
literature, but if your staff are unaware of
what it means to be part of Joe Bloggs Builders
Merchants and have no idea what the company’s
brand values are then tradesmen will be
sceptical too. |
|
The term ‘employee
branding’ may sound like a fluffy marketing
industry initiative, but it is a strategy being
implemented across British business as more and
| | | | | |